British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol 33, Issue 3 186-189, Copyright © 1999 by British Association of Sport and Medicine

A preliminary study of patient comfort associated with customised mouthguards

C McClelland, M Kinirons and L Geary
School of Dentistry, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient perception of custom made mouthguards of ideal and less than ideal designs in terms of their comfort and "wearability". METHOD: A mouthguard of ideal design (A) and one incorporating common design faults of underextension and unadjusted occlusion (B) were provided for 22 active sportsmen and women. They were not informed of the details of the design or the status of the protector. Half the participants were asked to wear mouthguard A first and the other half wore B first, each worn for one hour on two consecutive nights. Questionnaires were used to evaluate and rate the comfort and wearability of each mouthguard. RESULTS: Eighteen people completed the study. The ideal appliance was rated as significantly more retentive and comfortable overall and specifically was more comfortable to lips, gums, and tongue. It was also recognised as being less bulky, less likely to keep the teeth apart, or to cause pain in the jaw muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Comfort is likely to be increased if mouthguards are extended labially to within 2 mm of the vestibular reflection, adjusted to allow even occlusal contact, rounded at the buccal peripheries, and tapered at the palatal edges.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Salam, S., Caldwell, S. (2008). Mouthguards and orthodontic patients. J. Orthod. 35: 270-275 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Maeda, Y, Machi, H, Tsugawa, T, Patrick, D G (2006). Influences of palatal side design and finishing on the wearability and retention of mouthguards * Commentary. Br. J. Sports. Med. 40: 1006-1008 [Abstract] [Full Text]