Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Sports Medicine 1999;33:336-339; doi:10.1136/bjsm.33.5.336
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol 33, Issue 5 336-339, Copyright © 1999 by British Association of Sport and Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise

KL Lamb, RG Eston and D Corns
Department of Physical Education and Sports, Science, University College Chester, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the test-retest reliability (repeatability) of Borg's 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale using a more appropriate statistical technique than has been employed in previous investigations. The RPE scale is used widely in exercise science and sports medicine to monitor and/or prescribe levels of exercise intensity. The "95% limits of agreement" technique has recently been advocated as a better means of assessing within-subject (trial to trial) agreement than traditional indicators such as Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients. METHODS: Sixteen male athletes (mean (SD) age 23.6 (5.1) years) completed two identical multistage (incremental) treadmill running protocols over a period of two to five days. RPEs were requested and recorded during the final 15 seconds of each three minute stage. All subjects successfully completed at least four stages in each trial, allowing the reliability of RPE responses to be examined at each stage. RESULTS: The 95% limits of agreement (bias +/- 1.96 x SDdiff) were found to widen as exercise intensity increased: 0.88 (2.02) RPE units (stage 1), 0.25 (2.53) RPE units (stage 2), -0.13 (2.86) RPE units (stage 3), and -0.13 (2.94) RPE units (stage 4). Pearson correlations (0.81, 0.72, 0.65, and 0.60) and intraclass correlations (0.82, 0.80, 0.77, and 0.75) decreased as exercise intensity increased. CONCLUSIONS: These findings question the test- retest reliability of the RPE scale when used to monitor subjective estimates of exercise intensity in progressive (or graded) exercise tests.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Davies, R C, Rowlands, A V, Eston, R G (2008). The prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from submaximal ratings of perceived exertion elicited during the multistage fitness test. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 1006-1010 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nichols, A W (2008). Sports medicine clinical trial research publications in academic medical journals between 1996 and 2005: an audit of the PubMed MEDLINE database. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 909-912 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tompkins, J., Bosch, P. R, Chenowith, R., Tiede, J. L, Swain, J. M (2008). Changes in Functional Walking Distance and Health-Related Quality of Life After Gastric Bypass Surgery. ptjournal 88: 928-935 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • St Clair Gibson, A, Noakes, T D (2004). Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. Br. J. Sports. Med. 38: 797-806 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Buckley, J. P, Eston, R. G, Sim, J. (2000). Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode. Br. J. Sports. Med. 34: 297-302 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ