Validation of an instrument for injury data collection in rugby union

Alexandra McManus

Centre for Health Promotion Research, School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: A McManus email: mcmanusa{at}health.curtin.edu.au

Objective—To provide the basis for collecting rugby union injury data using a rigorously validated injury report form.

Methods—Seven stages were used to assess face, content, and criterion validity of the rugby union injury report form. A 22 member panel plus four sporting bodies assessed the form for face validity, and an expert panel assessed it for content and criterion validity. Panel members were consulted until consensus was reached. A yardstick developed by an expert panel using the Delphi technique was used to assess the reliability of the form. An independent panel of 10 viewed a series of five videotaped injuries, three times over a five week period to assess inter-rater and intrarater reliability. The form was then trialed by 40 people in situ during four games.

Results—The rugby union injury report form for games and training was developed, and the face, content, and criterion validity successfully assessed. A seven step protocol to create a yardstick was also developed to assist in the validation process. Both inter-rater and intrarater reliability results indicated a 98% agreement. The 40 trialists who completed forms in situ during four games were found to have an inter-rater reliability agreement of 98% for nine injuries.

Conclusions—A measurement instrument for injury data collection in rugby union was successfully developed and validated, providing researchers with a basis for future studies in this area. A procedure to develop future injury data collection instruments in other sports was also developed.

Key Words: data collection; validation; injury prevention; rugby union

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hammond, L E, Lilley, J, Ribbans, W J (2009). Coding sports injury surveillance data: has version 10 of the Orchard Sports Injury Classification System improved the classification of sports medicine diagnoses?. Br. J. Sports. Med. 43: 498-502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pluim, B M, Staal, J B, Windler, G E, Jayanthi, N (2006). Tennis injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention.. Br. J. Sports. Med. 40: 415-423 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rae, K, Britt, H, Orchard, J, Finch, C (2005). Classifying sports medicine diagnoses: a comparison of the International classification of diseases 10-Australian modification (ICD-10-AM) and the Orchard sports injury classification system (OSICS-8). Br. J. Sports. Med. 39: 907-911 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hagglund, M, Walden, M, Bahr, R, Ekstrand, J (2005). Methods for epidemiological study of injuries to professional football players: developing the UEFA model. Br. J. Sports. Med. 39: 340-346 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• George, J., Phun, Y.-T., Bailey, M. J, Kong, D. C., Stewart, K. (2004). Development and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 1369-1376 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Junge, A., Dvorak, J., Graf-Baumann, T., Peterson, L. (2004). Football Injuries During FIFA Tournaments and the Olympic Games, 1998-2001: Development and Implementation of an Injury-Reporting System. Am J Sports Med 32: 80S-89S [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bathgate, A, Best, J P, Craig, G, Jamieson, M, Wiley, J P (2002). A prospective study of injuries to elite Australian rugby union players * Commentary. Br. J. Sports. Med. 36: 265-269 [Abstract] [Full Text]