ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The quality of research in sports journals

C Bleakley¹, D MacAuley²

¹ Institute of Postgraduate Medical and Health Science, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT36 0QB, UK
² Department of Epidemiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor MacAuley, Department of Epidemiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK;
dc.macauley{at}ulst.ac.uk

Objective: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research.

Methods: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method.

Results: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p<0.0001) in the contents of the four journals but when they were compared by categorising the better quality methods together (randomised control trial, case-control, and cohort studies), the difference was not significant (p = 0.09).

Conclusions: The overall pattern of publication type seems remarkably stable over medical journals, indicating that the quality of sports medicine research is comparable to that in other specialities.

Keywords: research; quality; evidence basis; study types

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nichols, A W (2008). Sports medicine clinical trial research publications in academic medical journals between 1996 and 2005: an audit of the PubMed MEDLINE database. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 909-912 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lai, T. Y. Y., Leung, G. M., Wong, V. W. Y., Lam, R. F., Cheng, A. C. O., Lam, D. S. C. (2006). How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals?. IOVS 47: 1831-1838 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murray, I R, Murray, S A, MacKenzie, K, Coleman, S, Cullen, M (2005). How evidence based is the management of two common sports injuries in a sports injury clinic? * Commentary. Br. J. Sports. Med. 39: 912-916 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reider, B. (2005). The Search for Quality. Am J Sports Med 33: 1801-1802 [Full Text]  
• Brophy, R. H., Gardner, M. J., Saleem, O., Marx, R. G. (2005). An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Research Published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine. Am J Sports Med 33: 1812-1815 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bleakley, C, MacAuley, D, McDonough, S (2004). Are sports medicine journals relevant and applicable to practitioners and athletes?. Br. J. Sports. Med. 38: e23-e23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chalmers, D J (2002). Injury prevention in sport: not yet part of the game?. Inj. Prev. 8: iv22-25 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• MacAuley, D., Best, T. M (2002). Reducing risk of injury due to exercise. BMJ 325: 451-452 [Full Text]