© 2002 British Journal of Sports Medicine
REVIEW
Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Carpinelli, Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Health, Physical Education and Human Performance Science, Woodruff Hall, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York 11530, USA;
q-nautilus{at}worldnet.att.net
The evidence that multiple sets of exercise are superior to a single set for maximal strength gains, as suggested by Berger in 1962, is reviewed. The validity and practical significance of Berger's strength training study are questioned. Well controlled, methodologically sound studies that minimise confounding variables are required to support the hypothesis that multiple sets of exercise elicit superior gains in strength.
Keywords: resistance; exercise; single set; multiple sets; strength gains
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Carpinelli, R N
(2004). Science versus opinion. Br. J. Sports. Med.
38: 242-242
[Full Text] -
Carpinelli, R N
(2004). Science versus opinion. Br. J. Sports. Med.
38: 240-242
[Full Text] -
Berger, R A
(2003). Response to "Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength". Br. J. Sports. Med.
37: 372-373
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
