Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2003;37:59-61; doi:10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of three different sit and reach tests for measurement of hamstring flexibility in female university students

G Baltaci1, N Un2, V Tunay1, A Besler1, S Gerçeker3

1 School of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
2 School of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Ankara
3 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Gülhane Military Hospital, Ankara

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Baltaci, Hacettepe University School of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Sports Physiotherapy Unit, 06100 Ankara, Turkey;
sbaltaci{at}hotmail.com

Background: The sit and reach test is the most common flexibility test used in health related fitness test batteries.

Objective: To examine and compare three different sit and reach tests as a measure of hamstring flexibility in 102 female students.

Method: The traditional sit and reach test, the chair sit and reach test, the back saver sit and reach test, and passive straight leg raise were administered in three trials to all 102 students (mean (SD) age 22 (1) years) on the same day.

Results: A Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was significant (p<0.01) for the traditional sit and reach test with back saver sit and reach test and flexibility of hamstrings (r = 0.45 and 0.65 for left and right legs, and 0.63 and 0.53 for left and right legs respectively). Also, the back saver sit and reach test for the left (p<0.01) and right (p<0.05) leg was significantly associated with hamstring flexibility (r = 0.37 and 0.25 for the left leg and 0.50 and 0.44 for the right leg respectively).

Conclusion: The results indicate that the back saver sit and reach test produces reasonably accurate and stable measures of hamstring flexibility. Moreover, it appears that this test is a safe and acceptable alternative to the traditional and chair sit and reach tests as a measure of hamstring flexibility in young women.

Keywords: assessment; sit and reach test; hamstring; flexibility

Abbreviations: SR, sit and reach; CSR, chair sit and reach; BSSR, back saver sit and reach


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Costanzo, C., Walker, S. N., Yates, B. C., McCabe, B., Berg, K. (2006). Physical Activity Counseling for Older Women. West J Nurs Res 28: 786-801 [Abstract]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Validity comparison of different protocols
Sandro Sperandei
BJSM Online, 13 Jun 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ