Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2004;38:472-476; doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.005413
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18–45 years

J Norcross1 and M D Van Loan2

1 University of California, Davis, CA, USA
2 USDA-Western Human Nutrition Research Center, University of California, Davis

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Van Loan
One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; mvanloan{at}whnrc.usda.gov

Background: Pencil beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been shown to provide valid estimates of body fat (%BF), but DXA fan beam technology has not been adequately tested to determine its validity.

Objective: To compare %BF estimated from fan beam DXA with %BF determined using two and three compartment (2C, 3C) models.

Methods: Men (n = 25) and women (n = 31), aged 18–41 years, participated in the study. Body density, from hydrostatic weighing, was used in the 2C estimate of %BF; DXA was used to determine bone mineral content (BMC) for the 3C estimate of %BF calculated using body density and BMC (3CBMC). DXA was also used to determine %BF. Analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences in %BF between sexes and among methods.

Results: Women were significantly shorter, weighed less, had less fat free mass, and a higher %BF than men. No significant differences were found among methods (2C, 3CBMC, DXA) for determination of %BF in either sex. Although not significant, Bland-Altman plots showed that DXA gave higher values for %BF than the 2C and 3CBMC methods.

Conclusion: DXA determination of %BF was not different from that of the 2C and 3CBMC models in this group of young adults. However, to validate fan beam DXA fully as a method for body composition assessment in a wide range of individuals and populations, comparisons are needed that use a 4C model with a measure of total body water and BMC.

Abbreviations: %BF, percentage body fat; BFLM, bone free lean mass; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; DXA, dual energy x ray absorptiometry; FFM, fat free mass; FM, fat mass; HW, hydrostatic weighing; TBW, total body water

Keywords: fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry; body fat; multicompartment model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ