HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zetaruk, M N Articles by Micheli, L J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zetaruk, M N Articles by Micheli, L J

Injuries in martial arts: a comparison of five styles

¹ Children’s Hospital, University of Manitoba, Canada
² University of Barcelona, Spain
³ Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Zetaruk
Pediatric Sports and Dance Medicine Program, Children’s Hospital, 840 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg MB, R3A 1S1, Canada; mzetaruk{at}shaw.ca

Objective: To compare five martial arts with respect to injury outcomes.

Methods: A one year retrospective cohort was studied using an injury survey. Data on 263 martial arts participants (Shotokan karate, n = 114; aikido, n = 47; tae kwon do, n = 49; kung fu, n = 39; tai chi, n = 14) were analysed. Predictor variables included age, sex, training frequency (3 h/week v >3 h/week), experience (<3 years v 3 years), and martial art style. Outcome measures were injuries requiring time off from training, major injuries (7 days off), multiple injuries (3), body region, and type of injury. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). Fisher’s exact test was used for comparisons between styles, with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results: The rate of injuries, expressed as percentage of participants sustaining an injury that required time off training a year, varied according to style: 59% tae kwon do, 51% aikido, 38% kung fu, 30% karate, and 14% tai chi. There was a threefold increased risk of injury and multiple injury in tae kwon do than karate (p<0.001). Subjects 18 years of age were at greater risk of injury than younger ones (p<0.05; OR 3.95; CI 1.48 to 9.52). Martial artists with at least three years experience were twice as likely to sustain injury than less experienced students (p<0.005; OR 2.46; CI 1.51 to 4.02). Training >3 h/week was also a significant predictor of injury (p<0.05; OR 1.85; CI 1.13 to 3.05). Compared with karate, the risks of head/neck injury, upper extremity injury, and soft tissue injury were all higher in aikido (p<0.005), and the risks of head/neck, groin, and upper and lower extremity injuries were higher in tae kwon do (p<0.001). No sex differences were found for any of the outcomes studied.

Conclusions: There is a higher rate of injury in tae kwon do than Shotokan karate. Different martial arts have significantly different types and distribution of injuries. Martial arts appear to be safe for young athletes, particularly those at beginner or intermediate levels.

Keywords: injuries; martial arts; prevention; epidemiology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. S. Gong, Y. H. Kim, and M. S. Park Varus instability of the hallux interphalangeal joint in a taekwondo athlete Br. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 41(12): 917 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S-H Yeh, H Chuang, L-W Lin, C-Y Hsiao, and H L Eng Regular tai chi chuan exercise enhances functional mobility and CD4CD25 regulatory T cells. Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 40(3): 239 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]