Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2005;39:742-746; doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.016980
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function

D A Baden1, T L McLean2, R Tucker2, T D Noakes2 and A St Clair Gibson2

1 University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
2 University of Cape Town, Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Newlands, South Africa

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor St Clair Gibson
University of Cape Town, Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Newlands 7725, South Africa; agibson{at}sports.uct.ac.za

Objectives: To determine the effect of unknown exercise duration and an unexpected increase in exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion (RPE), affect, and running economy during treadmill running.

Methods: Sixteen well trained male and female runners completed three bouts of treadmill running at 75% of their peak treadmill running speed. In the first trial, they were told to run for 20 minutes and were stopped at 20 minutes (20 MIN). In another trial, they were told to run for 10 minutes, but at 10 minutes were told to run for a further 10 minutes (10 MIN). In the final trial, they were not told for how long they would be running but were stopped after 20 minutes (unknown, UN). During each of the running bouts, RPE, oxygen consumption (ml/kg/min), heart rate (beats/min), stride frequency (min–1), affect scores (arbitrary units), and attentional focus (percentage associative thought scores) were recorded.

Results: RPE increased significantly between 10 and 11 minutes in the 10 MIN compared with the 20 MIN and UN trials (p<0.05). The affect score decreased significantly between 10 and 11 minutes in the 10 MIN compared with the 20 MIN trial (p<0.05). Running economy, as measured by oxygen consumption, was significantly lower in the UN compared with the 20 MIN trial from 10 to 19 minutes (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The change in RPE between 10 and 11 minutes in the 10 MIN trial suggests that RPE is not purely a measure of physical exertion, as treadmill speed was maintained at a constant pace both before and after the unexpected increase in exercise duration. The associated changes in affect score at similar times in the 10 MIN trial supports the hypothesis that RPE has an affective component.

Abbreviations: PTRS, peak treadmill running speed; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; V·O2, oxygen consumption

Keywords: perceived exertion; pacing; affect; fatigue; exercise


 

Commentary

A M Hunter3

3 Department of Sports Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK; a.m.hunter1{at}stir.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tucker, R, Noakes, T D (2009). The physiological regulation of pacing strategy during exercise: a critical review. Br. J. Sports. Med. 43: e1-e1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tucker, R (2009). The anticipatory regulation of performance: the physiological basis for pacing strategies and the development of a perception-based model for exercise performance. Br. J. Sports. Med. 43: 392-400 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ