ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Is postural control affected by expertise in alpine skiing?

F Noé and T Paillard

Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Tarbes, France

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Frederic Noé
Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Tarbes, France; frederic.noe{at}univ-pau.fr

Objectives: This study examined the postural performance of two groups of male skiers competing at different levels and the consequences on postural control of the suppression of visual afferences by eye closure.

Methods: Seven national level (NAT) skiers and 7 regional level (REG) skiers were asked to stand as still as possible on a force platform with eyes opened and closed and while wearing or not wearing their ski boots in a stable posture and in two unstable postures (in the sagittal or frontal plane). Postural performance was assessed with centre of foot pressure measurements.

Results: REG and NAT skiers were similarly influenced by the absence of visual information and presented similar postural performance when tests were performed with ski boots. However, without ski boots, REG skiers displayed better postural performance than NAT skiers.

Conclusions: The inferior postural performance of NAT skiers without ski boots could be a long term effect of repetitive wearing of ski boots, which impairs postural performance by restricting the range of motion of the ankle-foot complex. Since individuals with decreased postural performance are believed to be more susceptible to ankle injury than those with finer postural control, NAT skiers should benefit from specific training aimed at improving postural ability and preventing ankle injury.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; AP, antero/posterior; COP, centre of foot pressure; EC, eyes closed; EO, eyes opened; NAT, national level; REF, reference condition; REG, regional level; SD, standard deviation; STA, stable

Keywords: alpine skiing; balance; expertise; humans; posture

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?