Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2005;39:594-598; doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.011981
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dynamic soft tissue mobilisation increases hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects

D Hopper1, S Deacon2, S Das2, A Jain2, D Riddell2, T Hall2 and K Briffa1

1 Curtin University of Technology, Shenton Park, WA 6008, Australia
2 Private Practice, Perth, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Diana Hopper
Curtin University of Technology, School of Physiotherapy, Shenton Park, WA 6008, Australia; d.hopper{at}curtin.edu.au

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dynamic soft tissue mobilisation (STM) on hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects.

Methods: Forty five males volunteered to participate in a randomised, controlled single blind design study. Volunteers were randomised to either control, classic STM, or dynamic STM intervention. The control group was positioned prone for 5 min. The classic STM group received standard STM techniques performed in a neutral prone position for 5 min. The dynamic STM group received all elements of classic STM followed by distal to proximal longitudinal strokes performed during passive, active, and eccentric loading of the hamstring. Only specific areas of tissue tightness were treated during the dynamic phase. Hamstring flexibility was quantified as hip flexion angle (HFA) which was the difference between the total range of straight leg raise and the range of pelvic rotation. Pre- and post-testing was conducted for the subjects in each group. A one-way ANCOVA followed by pairwise post-hoc comparisons was used to determine whether change in HFA differed between groups. The {alpha} level was set at 0.05.

Results: Increase in hamstring flexibility was significantly greater in the dynamic STM group than either the control or classic STM groups with mean (standard deviation) increase in degrees in the HFA measures of 4.7 (4.8), –0.04 (4.8), and 1.3 (3.8), respectively.

Conclusions: Dynamic soft tissue mobilisation (STM) significantly increased hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects.

Abbreviations: DDMT, deep muscle tissue model; DOMS, delayed onset muscle soreness; HFA, hip flexion angle; ICC, intraclass correlation; LSD, least significant difference; ROM, range of motion; SLR, straight leg raise; STM, soft tissue mobilisation

Keywords: flexibility; hamstring muscles; massage; range of motion; soft tissue mobilisation


 

Commentary

Bill (Guglielmo) Vicenzino3

3 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; b.vicenzino{at}shrs.uq.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ