SUPPLEMENT
Value of neuropsychological testing after head injuries in football
1 Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2 Cabrini Medical Centre, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
3 CogState Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P McCrory
University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; paulmccr{at}bigpond.net.au
This paper reviews the pros and cons of the traditional paper and pencil and the newer computerised neuropsychological tests in the management of sports concussion. The differences between diagnosing concussion on the field and neuropsychological assessment at follow up and decision making with regard to return to play are described. The authors also discuss the issues involved in interpreting the results of neuropsychological testing (comparison with population norms versus players own baseline test results) and potential problems of such testing in football. Finally, suggested recommendations for neuropsychological testing in football are given.
Keywords: concussion; football; head injury; neuropsychology; soccer
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
