REVIEW
EULAR recommendations for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a critique of the methodology
Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Doherty
Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; michael.doherty{at}nottingham.ac.uk
The quality of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) was evaluated using a validated instrument. The quality and methods were compared with other guidelines and recommendations. EULAR recommendations were found to be among the best for overall quality. They show strengths with respect to scope, rigour of development, and clarity, but weaknesses with respect to stakeholder involvement, applicability, and editorial independence. However, a principal strength is their attempt to fill the gap between guidelines based solely on either research evidence or expert opinion. The methods used to synthesise research evidence (systematic review) and expert opinion (Delphi exercise) are robust. Strength of recommendation, based on combined consideration of research evidence, clinical expertise, and perceived patient preference, is valid and approaches the true essence of "evidence based practice" that considers each of these different forms of evidence.
Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; OA, osteoarthritis; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SOR, strength of recommendation; VAS, visual analogue scale
Keywords: hip; knee; osteoarthritis; EULAR; guidelines
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zhang, W, Doherty, M, Leeb, B F, Alekseeva, L, Arden, N K, Bijlsma, J W, Dincer, F, Dziedzic, K, Hauselmann, H J, Kaklamanis, P, Kloppenburg, M, Lohmander, L S, Maheu, E, Martin-Mola, E, Pavelka, K, Punzi, L, Reiter, S, Smolen, J, Verbruggen, G, Watt, I, Zimmermann-Gorska, I
(2009). EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: report of a task force of ESCISIT. Ann Rheum Dis
68: 8-17
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Zhang, W, Doherty, M, Leeb, B F, Alekseeva, L, Arden, N K, Bijlsma, J W, Dincer, F, Dziedzic, K, Hauselmann, H J, Herrero-Beaumont, G, Kaklamanis, P, Lohmander, S, Maheu, E, Martin-Mola, E, Pavelka, K, Punzi, L, Reiter, S, Sautner, J, Smolen, J, Verbruggen, G, Zimmermann-Gorska, I
(2007). EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis
66: 377-388
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
