Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 5 June 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.037812
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;41:897-902
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Computer-based quantification of the mean Achilles tendon thickness in ultrasound images: effect of tendinosis

R Syha1, M Peters2, H Birnesser2, A Niess3, A Hirschmueller1, H-H Dickhuth1, M Sandrock3

1 Freiburg University Hospital, Centre for Internal Medicine, Department for Rehabilitative and Preventative Sports Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
2 Freiburg University Hospitals, Department for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Division for Sportorthopaedics, Freiburg, Germany
3 Tuebingen University Hospitals, Centre for Internal Medicine, Department for Sports Medicine, Tuebingen, Germany

Markus Sandrock, Tuebingen University Hospital, Centre for Internal Medicine, Department for Sports Medicine, Silcherstreet.5, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; markus.sandrock{at}gmx.de

Background: B-mode measurement of the sagital diameter of the Achilles tendon based on a manual tracing (MT) procedure is partly dependent on the subjectivity of the reader. The aim of this study is to establish a standardised automatic procedure to differentiate between normal and chronically degenerated tendons. For this comparison, the tracing results of the tendon boundaries of an automatic identification (AI) process, already established with the detection of intima–media thickness, are compared with computer-assisted MT.

Methods: The detection of the tendon boundaries was performed in 115 ultrasound images including the cranial border of the calcaneal tuberosity. The measured section (starting point 4 cm away from the anterior boundary of the calcaneal tuberosity) amounted to 3 cm, and was divided into three sub-segments (1 cm each). Intra- and inter-reader/observer variability for mean and maximum Achilles tendon thickness (ATT) with AI and MT were evaluated. A normal group and a group with clinically diagnosed chronic tendon degeneration had mean and maximum ATT readings compared.

Results: Using MT, the intra- and inter-reader variability was 3.0% and 6.8%, respectively, using AI the variability was 1.6% and 3.9%, respectively. Mean and maximum ATT were measured systematically lower by AI compared to MT in all regions by 0.4 mm. The AI procedure was most accurate in the second segment. The mean ATT and maximum ATT were correctly detected in 93.9% and 96.6% of the images.

Conclusion: The AI procedure detected the ATT with a high level of precision in all three segments. The most robust measurement was reached in the second segment. It eliminates most of the inter-/intra-reader variability in ATT measurement using MT. We suggest this new method could be a new gold standard for quantification of chronic disorder in Achilles tendons.

Abbreviations: AI, automatic identification; AT, Achilles tendon; ATT, Achilles tendon thickness; MT, manual tracing; US, ultrasound


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Commentary on "Computer-based quantification of the mean Achilles tendon thickness in ultrasound images: effect of tendinosis"
Klaus-Michael Braumann
Br. J. Sports Med. 2007 41: 902. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ