Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 20 February 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.032904
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;41:435-438
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Do sensorial manipulations affect subjects differently depending on their postural abilities?

Thierry Paillard1, Riadh Bizid1 and Philippe Dupui2

1 Department of Sports Science, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Tarbes, Cedex, France
2 School medicine, Université de Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Paillard
Department of Sports Science, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, 6500 Tarbes, France; thierry.paillard{at}univ-pau.fr

Objectives: To examine whether sensorial manipulation affects subjects differently according to their postural performance and the strategies used. The literature showed that the level of competition of soccer players influences their postural performance and strategy.

Methods: Eight high-level (HL) professional soccer players and nine regional-level (RL) soccer players were tested (1) in a reference condition and (2) in a manipulated sensorial condition (MAN). The MAN condition consisted of perturbing the proprioceptive and exteroceptive information. For each postural condition, balance was assessed by measuring the centre of foot pressure using a force platform during a test of bipedal standing posture.

Results: The postural control was less perturbed in the HL than in the RL players in the two postural conditions. Moreover, the group–condition interaction showed that the postural control was less disturbed in the HL than in the RL players when the sensory information was manipulated.

Conclusions: The HL soccer players probably possessed a better internal model of verticality than the RL players. Subjects who had a better postural control level were less disturbed by sensorial manipulation than the others in postural regulation.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; COP, centre of foot pressure; EC, eyes closed; EO, eyes open; HL, high level; LF, low frequency; MAN, manipulated sensorial condition; REF, reference condition; RL, regional level


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ