Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 14 May 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.035204
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;41:603-609
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The 2004 Olympic Games: physiotherapy services in the Olympic Village polyclinic

Spyridon Athanasopoulos1, Eleni Kapreli2, Aikaterini Tsakoniti1, Konstantinos Karatsolis1, Konstantinos Diamantopoulos3, Konstantinos Kalampakas3, Demetrios G Pyrros4, Costas Parisis5, Nikolaos Strimpakos2

1 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Greece
2 TEI Lamias, Department of Physiotherapy, Greece
3 Physiopraxis Clinic, Greece
4 National Centre of Emergency Care, Greece
5 General Hospital of Ag. Paulos, Greece

Dr E Kapreli, TEI Lamias, Department of Physiotherapy, 3rd Km Old National Road Lamia-Athens, Lamia, 35100, Greece; ekapreli{at}teilam.gr

Objective: First, to document the injuries sustained during the 2004 Olympic Games in a sample of patients visiting the physiotherapy department of the Olympic Village polyclinic. Second, to provide information and data about the physiotherapy services for planning future Olympics and other mass gatherings.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Olympic Village polyclinic.

Participants: 457 patients aged 15–72 years visited the physiotherapy department from 30 July through 30 August.

Results: The department’s workload was at a peak during the last 15 days of the Olympic Games (periods B and C). The most common injuries were overuse injuries (47.3%). The most common pathology for physiotherapy attendance was myofascial pain/muscle spasm (32.5%), followed by tendinopathy (19.2%) and ligament sprain (18.7%). The most prevalent site of injury was the thigh (21%), followed by the knee (14.1%) and the lumbar spine (13.5%). Most injuries had symptoms of <7 days’ duration. The geographical region with the greatest demand for physiotherapy services was Africa (40.6%). Most patients were athletes (74.8%), although team officials accounted for a considerable number (14%).

Conclusions: The smallest national teams—especially those from developing countries—were more likely to take advantage of services, probably because the larger teams had their own medical and physiotherapy staff. The characteristics of patients, their sustained injuries and the subsequent treatment varied by the accreditation status of the patients. The physiotherapy department’s workload was dependent on the Olympic Games schedule.

Keywords: Olympic Games; physiotherapy; sports injuries; athletic injuries


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Commentary on "The 2004 Olympic Games: physiotherapy services in the Olympic Village polyclinic"
Michael J Callaghan
Br. J. Sports Med. 2007 41: 609. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ