Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 29 June 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.034116
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;42:36-41
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients

K Woolf-May, D Ferrett

Canterbury Christ Church University College and Activity for Health, Kent, UK

Dr K Woolf-May, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holrnes Road, Canterbury, Kent CT1 1QU, UK; kate.woolf-may{at}canterbury.ac.uk

Objective: Comorbidities are found to affect metabolic equivalents (METs). Therefore the main objective of this study was to compare METs (1 MET: oxygen uptake (VO2) 3.5 ml/kg/min) during an incremental shuttle walking test (SWT) between non-cardiac and post-myocardial infarction (MI) men, and secondly to determine any differences in VO2 (ml/kg/min) between flat treadmill walking and the turning during the shuttle walking in non-cardiac subjects.

Design: Comparative study.

Subjects: Thirty one post-MI (mean (SD) age 63.5 (6.5), range 53–77 years) from phase IV cardiac rehabilitation and 19 non-cardiac (64.6 (7.5), range 51–76 years) men participated.

Methods: All subjects performed an SWT, and non-cardiac subjects a treadmill test of similar protocol. Throughout both, the subject’s VO2 was measured.

Results: Analysis comparing lines of regression showed METs at 1.12 to 4.16 mph were higher (p<0.001) for post-MIs versus non-cardiac subjects. For non-cardiac subjects, there were no differences between the treadmill test and SWT (p>0.9) and LoA showed acceptable agreement in METs between treadmill vs SWT, mean difference –1.1 (8.8) (1.96SD).

Conclusion: It would appear that for asymptomatic individuals it is appropriate to apply established METs for flat walking to the SWT. However, the significantly higher METs for the post-MI compared with the non-cardiac subjects indicates the need for caution when using METs derived from healthy subjects in the prescription of exercise for myocardial patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Commentary 1 on "Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients"
Marie H Murphy
Br. J. Sports Med. 2008 42: 41. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Commentary 2 "Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients"
Sally Singh
Br. J. Sports Med. 2008 42: 41. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ