Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 2 April 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.041822
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;42:352-356
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Association between walking distance and percentiles of body mass index in older and younger men

P T Williams

Dr Paul T Williams, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Donner Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; ptwilliams{at}lbl.gov

Objective: To assess the association of weekly walking distance to body weight and waist circumference in elderly (age >=75 years), senior (55<= age <75 years), middle-aged (35<= age <55 years), and younger men (18<= age <35 years old).

Design: Cross-sectional analyses of baseline questionnaires from 7082 male participants of the National Walkers’ Health Study.

Results: Standard regression analyses showed that body mass index (BMI) was inversely and significantly associated with walking distance (kg/m2 per km/week) in elderly (slope (SE): –0.032 (0.008)), senior (–0.045 (0.005)) and middle-aged men (–0.037 (0.007)), as were their waist circumferences (–0.090 (0.025), –0.122 (0.012) and –0.091 (0.015) cm per km/week, respectively), and that these slopes remained significant when adjusted statistically for reported weekly servings of meat, fish, fruit and alcohol. However, percentile regression analyses showed that the declines in BMI per km/week walked were greater at the higher than the lower percentiles of the BMI distribution. In men >=74 years old the decline per km walked was 4.9-fold greater among the heaviest men (that is, 90th BMI percentile; –0.076 kg/m2 per km/week) than among the leanest men (that is, 10th BMI percentile; –0.015 kg/m2 per km/week). The differences in slope at the 90th compared to the 10th BMI percentile were 5.4-fold among men 55–74 years old and sixfold among men 35–54 years old. Per km/week walked, the declines at the 90th percentile of waist circumference were also greater than at its 10th percentile, and intermediate for percentiles in between. Whereas standard regression analyses suggest that the average declines in BMI per km/week walked reported here are consistent with those reported previously per km/week run in male runners 35–54 years old (–0.036 (0.001) kg/m2 per km/week) and >=50 years old (–0.038 (0.001) kg/m2 per km/week), percentile regression analyses showed that when adjusted to the leaner body weights of the runners the declines per km walked were between 49% and 59% less for walkers than runners.

Conclusions: Declines in BMI and waist circumferences with walking distance depend upon the percentile of the BMI distribution, with the decline per km walked being significantly greater among heavier men.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Sports medicine, on the forefront of spreading a little love in this world
Steven Stovitz
Br. J. Sports Med. 2008 42: 313. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Khan, K. M (2008). Debating transversus abdominis, the "exercise pill" and whether flying limits athletes' performance on arrival. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 861-861 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ