Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 7 April 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.046342
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2009;43:750-755
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Original articles

Heart rate and exercise intensity during training: observations from the DREW Study

C R Mikus1, C P Earnest1, S N Blair2, T S Church1

1 Preventive Medicine Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
2 Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

Correspondence to Dr Timothy S Church, Preventive Medicine Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA; tim.church{at}pbrc.edu

Objective: Cardiovascular drift (CVdrift) is characterised by a continuous, gradual increase in heart rate (HR) after ~10 min of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, despite maintenance of a constant work rate. This has important implications for trials that employ HR to monitor exercise intensity, as reducing work rate in order to keep HR constant could result in participants exercising below the intended intensity. Utilising the Dose Response to Exercise in Women (DREW) database, we sought to determine if increases in HR during exercise (CVdrift) resulted in clinically significant reductions in exercise work rate in order to keep HR within a target range.

Design: Randomised, prospective study.

Setting: DREW clinical exercise trail, The Cooper Institute, Dallas, Texas.

Participants: Overweight (body mass index 25–43 kg/m2), previously sedentary postmenopausal women (n = 326).

Intervention: Treadmill and cycling exercise (30–90 min, three to five times per week) at a HR corresponding to 50% of peak oxygen uptake (Vo2peak).

Main outcome measure: Changes in exercise intensity (metabolic equivalents (METS)) during exercise in response to CVdrift.

Results: We observed small increases in HR (1–4 beats per minute, p<0.001) combined with small increases in intensity (0.01–0.03 METS, p<0.03) during the combined 12 963 exercise training sessions. Further, we identified only 101 (0.78%) sessions in which intensity was reduced during the course of the exercise session, potentially in response to CVdrift.

Conclusions: We conclude that CVdrift did not contribute to significant reductions in exercise intensity in the DREW study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ