BJSM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 September 2008

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 28 February 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.042200
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjsm.2007.042200v1
bjsm.2007.042200v2
bjsm.2007.042200v3
bjsm.2007.042200v4
42/9/709    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOSQUET, L.
Right arrow Articles by AUBERT, A. E
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BOSQUET, L.
Right arrow Articles by AUBERT, A. E
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

Review Article

Is heart rate a convenient tool to monitor overreaching? A systematic review of the literature

LAURENT BOSQUET 1*, SAID MEKARI 1, DENIS ARVISAIS 1 and ANDRE E AUBERT 2

1 UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL, Canada
2 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: laurent.bosquet{at}gmail.com.

Accepted 9 February 2008


*   Abstract

Objective: A meta-analysis is conducted on the effect of overload training on resting heart rate, submaximal and maximal exercise heart rates and on heart rate variability, to determine whether these measures can be used as valid markers of overreaching.

Methods: Six databases were searched using relevant terms and strategies. Criteria for study inclusion were: participants must be competitive athletes; an increased training load intervention must be employed; all necessary data to calculate effect sizes must be available. An arbitrary limit of two weeks was chosen to make the distinction between short term and long term interventions. Dependant variables were heart rate and heart rate variability (during supine rest). Pre–post intervention standardized mean differences (SMD) in heart rate or heart rate variability were calculated, and weighted according to the within– group heterogeneity to develop an overall effect.

Results: In these competitive athletes, short term interventions resulted in a moderate increase in both resting heart rate (SMD=0.55; p=0.01) and LF/HF (SMD=0.52; p=0.02), and a moderate decrease in maximal heart rate (SMD=-0.75; p=0.01). Long term interventions resulted in a small decrease of heart rate during submaximal (SMD=-0.38; p=0.006) and maximal exercise (SMD=-0.33; p=0.007), without alteration of resting values.

Conclusion: The small to moderate amplitude of these alterations limits their clinical usefulness, since expected differences may fall within day-to-day variability of these markers. Consequently, the correct interpretation of heart rate or heart rate variability fluctuations during the training process requires the comparison with other signs and symptoms of overreaching to be meaningful.


Relevant Article

What have overprescription of NSAIDs, overtraining and modelling physical activity for kids got to do with Barack Obama in Berlin?
Karim Khan
Br. J. Sports Med. 2008 42: 705-706. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine