BJSM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 6 June 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.044826
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guiraud, T.
Right arrow Articles by Passelergue, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guiraud, T.
Right arrow Articles by Passelergue, P.

Paper

VO2 requirement at different displayed power outputs on five cycle ergometer models-A preliminary study

Thibaut Guiraud 1, Luc Léger 1*, Arthur Long 1, Nicolas Thebault 1, Jonathan Tremblay 1 and Philippe Passelergue 2

1 Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, Canada
2 Staps Tarbes, UPPA, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: luc.leger{at}umontreal.ca.

Accepted 19 May 2008


*   Abstract

Background and aims: The validity of five brands of cycle ergometers was evaluated by the comparison of the VO2 requirements at different displayed power.

Methods and results: Five physically active males performed a continuous incremental exercise test on five ergometers (Ergomeca, Lifecycle, Monark, Polar S710 and Computrainer). The latter was also compared with a standard dynamometer in order to associate VO2 values with the real power. Every test started by 5-min warm up on the same cycle-ergometer (Ergomeca) at 100 W to make sure that the VO2 differences do not come from VO2 measurement error. Only last minute steady state VO2 values of each 2-min stage were used for the VO2/Watt curve. Large differences (5 to 10 ml kg-1 min-1) at the same displayed power indicate inaccuracy of displayed power output (PO). Using corrected power values from the dynamometer revealed that for the same VO2 the Computrainer underestimates PO by ~30 W between 100 and 300 W while the Lifecycle overestimate it by 3 to 53 W from 100 to 300 W. The Monark and Polar S710 underestimate PO by 15 W and the Ergomeca by ~5 W.

Conclusion: Inaccuracies between -10 to 18% in displayed PO of various cycle ergometers, question their interchangeability.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine