Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2009

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 2 April 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.045716
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Personal best marathon performance is associated with performance in a 24-hour run and not anthropometry or training volume

Beat Knechtle 1*, Andrea Wirth 1, Patrizia Knechtle 1, Kanai Zimmermann 2 and Goetz Kohler 3

1 Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, Switzerland
2 Sri Chinmoy Marathon Team Switzerland, Switzerland
3 Biozentrum, University of Basel, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: beat.knechtle{at}hispeed.ch.

Accepted 18 February 2008


Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of anthropometric and training parameters on race performance in ultra-endurance runners in a 24-hour-run.

DESIGN: Descriptive field study.

SETTING: The 24-hour-run in Basel 2007.

SUBJECTS: Fifteen male Caucasian ultra runners (mean ± SD; 46.7 ± 5.8 y, 71.1 ± 6.8 kg, 1.76 ± 0.07 m, BMI 23.1 ± 1.84 kg/m2).

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:Determination of age, body mass, body height, length of lower limbs, skin-fold thicknesses, circumference of extremities, skeletal muscle mass, BMI and percent body fat as well as training volume in 15 successful finishers in order to correlate anthropometric and training parameters with race performance.

RESULTS: No significant association (p>0.05) was found between the reached distance and the anthropometric properties. There was also no significant association of the reached distance with the weekly training hours, running years, the number of finished marathons and the number of finished 24-hour-runs. The reached distance is significantly (p<0.05) positively correlated with the personal best marathon performance (r2=0.40) and the personal best 24-hour-run distance (r2=0.58). Furthermore, the personal best marathon performance is highly significantly and positively correlated (p<0.01) with the best personal 24-hour-run distance (r2=0.76).

CONCLUSIONS: Anthropometry as well as training volume does not seem to have a major effect on race performance in a 24-hour-run. Instead, a fast personal best marathon time seems to be the only positive association with race performance in a 24-hour-run.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ