BJSM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 3 June 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.048298
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, A. J
Right arrow Articles by Fricker, P. A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, A. J
Right arrow Articles by Fricker, P. A

Paper

Respiratory symptoms and inflammatory responses to a DifflamTM throat spray intervention in half-marathon runners: A randomised controlled trial

Amanda J Cox 1*, Maree Gleeson 2, David B Pyne 1, Philo U Saunders 3, Robin Callister 2 and Peter A Fricker 1

1 Australian Institute of Sport, Australia
2 University of Newcastle, Australia
3 Australian Institute of Sport,, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amanda.cox{at}ausport.gov.au.

Accepted 6 May 2008


*   Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of DifflamTM Forte Anti-inflammatory Throat Spray on the incidence of upper respiratory symptoms (URS) and inflammatory responses following a half-marathon race. Design and Setting: Double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial conducted in association with a half-marathon event.

Participants: Forty-five well-trained half-marathon runners

Interventions: DifflamTM Forte Anti-inflammatory Throat Spray (n=25) or Placebo (n=20) throat sprays were self-administered three times daily for one week prior to and two weeks following the race.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported respiratory symptoms; plasma prostaglandin E2, myeloperoxidase, Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) concentrations; and salivary myeloperoxidase and IL-6 concentrations.

Results: All subjects completed the intervention without reporting any adverse events. The proportion of athletes reporting URS was not substantially different between Difflam (52%) and Placebo (56%) groups (p=0.82). However, symptom severity scores were ~30% lower during DifflamTM Forte Anti-inflammatory Throat Spray treatment (7.4 ± 8.2 versus 9.9 ± 11.7 arbitrary units). Post-exercise responses in plasma inflammatory markers did not differ substantially between Difflam and Placebo groups. Post-race increases in salivary myeloperoxidase (~63%; trivial to moderate difference; p=0.13) and salivary IL-6 (~50%; trivial to moderate difference; p=0.25) were greater in the Difflam group.

Conclusions: Prophylactic use of the DifflamTM Forte Anti-inflammatory Throat Spray reduced the severity, but not the frequency of upper respiratory symptoms among half-marathon runners. Post-race increases in systemic inflammatory markers were not altered by DifflamTM Forte Anti-inflammatory Throat Spray use, but markers of local inflammation (salivary myeloperoxidase and IL-6) were augmented in the Difflam compared with the Placebo group.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine