BJSM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 4 July 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.049486
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L
Right arrow Articles by Degens, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L
Right arrow Articles by Degens, H.

Paper

Effects of inspiratory muscle training on respiratory function and repetitive sprint performance in wheelchair basketball players

Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey 1*, Emma Foden 2, Claudio Perret 3 and Hans Degens 2

1 Loughborough University, United Kingdom
2 Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom
3 Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: v.l.tolfrey{at}lboro.ac.uk.

Accepted 3 June 2008


*   Abstract

Background: There is considerable evidence that respiratory muscle training improves pulmonary function, quality of life and exercise performance in healthy athletic populations. The benefits for wheelchair athletes are less well understood. Therefore, the present study examined the influence of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) upon respiratory function and repetitive propulsive sprint performance in wheelchair basketball players.

Methods: Using a placebo-controlled design, 16 wheelchair athletes were divided to an experimental (IMT; n=8) or placebo (sham-IMT; n=8) group based upon selective grouping criteria. The IMT group performed 30 dynamic breaths, twice daily at a resistance equivalent to 50% Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) and the sham-IMT group performed 60 slow breaths once a day at 15% MIP for a period of 6 weeks.

Results: The IMT group improved both MIP and MEP (17%, 23% respectively; p ≤0.03). Similar improvements were noted for the sham-IMT group with 23% and 33% from base-line for MIP and MEP respectively (p ≤0.03). There were no significant changes in pulmonary function at rest and any of the performance parameters associated with the repetitive sprint test (sprint and recovery times, HRpeak and peak blood lactate concentration). Reported experiences of using the IMT training device suggested ‘less breathlessness’ and ‘less tightness in the chest during the training’

Conclusions: Although there was no improvement in sprint performance, participants in both the IMT and sham-IMT reported an improved respiratory muscle function and quality of life.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine