Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 19 November 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.052845
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Original article

A prospective study of punch biomechanics and cognitive function for amateur boxers

Sarah Stojsih 1, Marilyn Boitano 2, Marianne Wilhelm 1 and Cynthia Bir 1*

1 Wayne State University, United States
2 McMaster University, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cbir{at}wayne.edu.

Accepted 13 October 2008


Abstract

Objective: Evaluate several biomechanical factors of the head during a sparring session and their link to cognitive function.

Design: Instrumented Boxing Headgear (IBH) was used for data collection during 4-two minute sparring sessions. Neurocognitive assessment was measured using the ImPACT© Concussion management software. A baseline neurocognitive test was obtained from each athlete prior to sparring; two additional tests were obtained and compared to the baseline.

Setting: Male and female amateur boxers.

Participants: Data were collected from 30 male and 30 female amateur boxers.

Main Outcome Measurements: Head accelerations (translational and rotational), injury severity indexes (Head Injury Criteria (HIC) and Gadd Severity Index (GSI)), and cognitive function scores.

Results: Peak translational and rotational acceleration values were 191 g and 17,156 rad/s2, respectively, for males and 184 g and 13,113 rad/s2, respectively, for females. The peak HIC and GSI values for males were 1,652 and 2,292, respectively, and for females were 1,079 and 1,487, respectively. There was no significant difference in the neurocognitive scores between genders. A decrease was exhibited in the delayed memory post bout scores. All other scores either increased or did not significantly decrease when compared to the baseline.

Conclusions: The majority of impacts experienced by both genders were under the threshold for mild head injury. There was a statistically significant difference between peak translational and rotational acceleration, HIC, and GSI when comparing genders. When analyzing cognitive functions there was no statistical difference between genders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ