Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 16 November 2009

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 21 October 2009. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.064972
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Original article

The role of the Sports and Exercise Medicine Physician in the National Health Service: A questionnaire-based survey

Patrick O`Halloran, Victoria Tzortziou Brown*, Kirsty Morgan, Nicola Maffulli, Mark Perry, Dylan Morrissey

Queen Mary University London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, United Kingdom

Correspondence to: Victoria Tzortziou Brown, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2 Maynards Quay, London, E1W 3RY, United Kingdom; victoriagiorgio{at}yahoo.co.uk

Accepted 3 October 2009

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the opinions of general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists, sport and exercise medicine (SEM) registrars and public health consultants on training, caseload, the most appropriate setting, and the position of SEM within the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom.

Method: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey investigated the opinions of the above professionals from three primary care trusts and associated hospitals in London and Birmingham.

Results: With a 50% response rate (n=226), 93% (208/224) of participants felt there was a role for SEM in the NHS. 56% (124/223) agreed this role should be in both primary and secondary care. 64% (136/212) of participants felt that their practice would benefit from the input of a SEM physician and 95% (191/202) would consider referring patients to SEM services. 74% (165/222) agreed SEM should have a public health role and 63% (140/222) believed these responsibilities should be evenly balanced with the treatment of sports injuries. Despite the emphasis on public health work from SEM policy makers, none of the SEM registrars selected public health as an important training area. 31% (44/140) of participants felt that a lack of education in the medical profession regarding SEM represented the greatest hindrance to its development in the NHS.

Conclusion: Several areas of agreement were demonstrated across the specialties, many of which matched the views of policy makers. This study involved participants from a range of cognate disciplines, and was the first to investigate this issue since SEM was recognised as a specialty in 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ