© 2002 British Journal of Sports Medicine
LEADER
Medical records
Who owns the information?
South Sydney Sports Medicine, 111 Anzac Parade, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Orchard;
johnorchard@msn.com.au
Databases of injuries in professional sport are valuable resources which should not suffer confidentiality restraints
Keywords: medical records; databases; injury records; confidentiality
When a doctor sees a patient and makes a medical record, there is potential for a dispute as to the relative rights that the doctor and patient have over this stored piece of information. The issue becomes more complicated when a third party such as an insurance company is involved. What about when more than ten parties are involved? How about when a professional sporting competition and a sponsor, on the advice of a research panel, pay a consultant to collect information from salaried team doctors and an insurance company on injuries that occurred to athletes at specific venues in the competition, and, as a result, the information is published in a medical journal and finally reported in the lay press? Is any of this information confidential? Can any of the listed parties object to the release of a report on the basis of their "ownership" of part
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
(2002). Privileged information?. J. Med. Ethics
28: 138-138
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
