EDITORIALS
Transversus abdominis: a different view of the elephant
Accepted 11 November 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It is good to see that clinical and research hypotheses are debated in the literature. The purpose of science is to challenge ideas and to consider alternative interpretations of observations. Within this, the place for neurophysiological/biomechanical studies in clinical research is not to predict the potential efficacy of a clinical approach, but to try to understand the mechanisms that underlie it. This is helpful as it provides a means to refine, improve, and direct intervention and provides a platform to develop rationales for intervention, particularly when we are faced with complex patients who do not fit the clinical prediction rule or the narrow criteria adopted for inclusion in clinical trials. If we understand the mechanisms we have a powerful tool to rationalise and test interventions. The developing debate about the role of transversus abdominis is healthy for rational consideration of motor control interventions for back pain.
I welcome this opportunity
Relevant Article
- Treating low back pain: Alexander technique and exercise, antibiotics (!) and Paul Hodges on dynamic stability
- Karim M Khan
Br. J. Sports Med. 2008 42: 939-940.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Khan, K. M
(2009). Another major win for physiotherapy -- curing patellofemoral pain. Br. J. Sports. Med.
43: 157-158
[Full Text] -
Khan, K.
(2009). Limiting our daily sitting/lying to just 23.5 hours: too ambitious?. Br. J. Sports. Med.
43: 79-79
[Full Text] -
Khan, K. M
(2008). Treating low back pain: Alexander technique and exercise, antibiotics (!) and Paul Hodges on dynamic stability. Br. J. Sports. Med.
42: 939-940
[Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- another view, another challenge forLBP
- Bernard Liew
- BJSM Online, 14 Apr 2009 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
