Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2004;38:11
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

WARM UP

Warm up

Genedicine

P McCrory

Continuing my occasional forays into gene technology, I was interested to see that regulatory authorities in China have licensed a gene therapy based treatment. This is the first time anywhere in the world that such a treatment has been authorized.

Although the therapy relates to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (a huge problem in southern China) the technology is relatively straightforward. The company, SiBiono GeneTech, uses an adenovirus as the vector to insert a gene designed to limit cancer cell growth. The results of trials have been published in the peer reviewed Chinese Medical Journal and show this technique to be dramatically effective compared with conventional radiotherapy. The beauty of the technique is that the virus does not integrate into the cell genome (thereby minimising the risk of leukaemia) but rather confines itself to the malignant cell line. The simplicity of the technique is echoed in the low cost (about US$ 360 per dose) and the ease by which virtually any doctor can administer the treatment.

Why is this of interest to practitioners of sports medicine? I have previously alluded to the issue of gene transfer technology as a threat to sports medicine.1 What we are seeing now is the transition of gene therapy from a promising experimental concept to an established mainstream treatment. While there is little doubt that gene medicine (or "genedicine") holds promise for the treatment of many currently untreatable diseases, it is also arguably the greatest threat facing modern sports medicine.

Imagine a simple and cheap treatment that can boost your red blood cell mass or give you bigger muscles on demand. Imagine also that this ergogenic therapy is undetectable. That is what genedicine is and can do at present—not in the future—now.

If you are an elite athlete and the Olympics or World Championships are coming up why consider an anabolic agent that can be picked up in drug tests or else needs a retinue of scientists manipulating the dose schedule to avoid detection? Once the bugs are sorted out, gene therapy is the way to go. The idea that scientists and government bodies will self regulate this area to prevent athletes accessing such treatments is simply ludicrous. They haven’t done this with other ergogenic agents so why start here? The World Anti-Doping Agency (www.wada-ama.org) seems to adhere to this belief. Good luck to them, but I seriously doubt whether anyone else in the world takes that view seriously.

REFERENCE

  1. McCrory P. Super athletes of gene cheats? Br J Sports Med 2003;37:192–194.[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The Promethean fire
P McCrory
Br. J. Sports Med. 2004 38: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ