Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2006

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 12 April 2006. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.022079
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Navicular stress fractures: outcomes of surgical and conservative management

Nicholas Potter 1, Peter Brukner 1*, Michael Makdissi 1, Kay Crossley 1 and Zoltan S Kiss 2

1 Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine; University of Melbourne, Australia
2 East Melbourne Radiology, Melbourne, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.brukner{at}unimelb.edu.au.

Accepted 8 March 2006


Abstract

Objective: To compare the two predominant long- term treatment options for navicular stress fractures - nonweightbearing cast immobilisation and surgical fixation.

Methods: Twenty six subjects, 18 years and older, were recruited who had been treated for a navicular stress fracture greater than 2 years previously (mean time 10.3 years). Treatment outcomes were assessed by analogue pain and function score,tenderness to palpation on examination, and abnormality detected on CT.

Results: A total of 32 fractures in 26 subjects were investigated. No statistically significant difference was found between surgical and conservative management for:Current Pain (p = 0.984),Current Function (p = 0.170), and abnormality on CT (p = 0.173). However surgically treated patients more often remained tender over the 'N spot' (p = 0.005) even after greater than 2 years return to competition.

Conclusions: Surgical fixation of navicular stress fractures is an equally effective treatment, compared to conservative management, over the longer term. However there remains a small, though measurable degree of pain and loss of function for patients over this period. Additionally, the effectiveness of using 'N spot' tenderness as the sole clinical predictor of treatment success requires further investigation, as some patients remained tender despite a successful treatment completion and return to competition.

Key Words: navicular, outcomes, stress fracture


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Niva, M. H., Sormaala, M. J., Kiuru, M. J., Haataja, R., Ahovuo, J. A., Pihlajamaki, H. K. (2007). Bone Stress Injuries of the Ankle and Foot: An 86-Month Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Study of Physically Active Young Adults. Am J Sports Med 35: 643-649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ