Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2006

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 17 February 2006. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.023408
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Shoulder strength profile in elite junior tennis players: horizontal adduction and abduction isokinetic evaluation

Rogerio Teixeira Silva 1*, Guilherme Conforto Gracitelli 1, Michele Forgiarini Saccol 1, Cristiano F.S. Laurino 1, Antonio C. Silva 1 and Jefferson Luiz Braga-Silva 1

1 Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rgtsilva{at}uol.com.br.

Accepted 9 February 2006


Abstract

Objective To establish a normative data of muscle performance, during isokinetic horizontal abduction and adduction of the shoulder, in elite junior tennis players.

Methods A total of 36 athletes were evaluated (23 males and 13 females), with a mean age of 14 years (range - 12 to 18). For the exam we used an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex 6000® - Ronkonkoma, NY), testing the shoulder horizontal abductors and adductors in 60 and 180 degrees per second. We reported the absolute and relative peak torque (PT and PT/BW), total work (TW), endurance ratio (ER) and the ratio of the peak torque between horizontal abductors and adductors (HAB/HAD ratio). The data were compared between dominant and non- dominant shoulder, horizontal abductor and adductor muscles and among the groups of tennis players divided by age.

Results The dominant shoulder was stronger than the non-dominant in all parameters (p<0,05), except form ER and HAB/HAD ratio. The abductors were weak in all players, when compared with the adductors (p<0,05). Also, the type of backhand (one-handed or two-handed drive) did not influence the strength of the shoulder horizontal abductors in the dominant arm. The number of years of tennis practice influenced the muscle strength in all absolute data (PT and TW), but not in the relative measurements (PT/BW and TW/BW).

Conclusion Our findings support that junior tennis players are stronger in the dominant shoulder for the horizontal abduction and adduction. The clinical relevance of the findings is not established, and more studies are needed to compare those athletes with others, and also the tennis players with non-sports individuals.

Key Words: isokinetic evaluation, shoulder, tennis, torque


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ