Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 January 2007

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 24 October 2006. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.026989
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

The effect of breathing an ambient low-density, hyperoxic gas on the perceived effort of breathing and maximal exercise performance in well-trained athletes

Les Ansley 1*, David Petersen 2, Alan Thomas 3, Alan St Clair Gibson 2, Paula Robson-Ansley 4 and Timothy David Noakes 2

1 Kingston University, United Kingdom
2 University of Cape Town, South Africa
3 National Hyperbarics, South Africa
4 University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: les{at}ansleyfamily.com.

Accepted 9 October 2006


Abstract

The role of the perception of breathing effort, in the regulation of maximal exercise performance, remains unclear. This study attempts to determine whether the perceived effort of ventilation is altered through substituting a less dense gas for normal ambient air and whether this substitution affects performance of maximal incremental exercise in trained athletes. Eight highly trained cyclists (VO2max = 69.9±7.9 mLO2.kg-1.min-1) performed two randomised maximal tests in a hyperbaric chamber breathing ambient air composed of either 35% O2/65% N2 (nitrox) or 35% O2/65% He (heliox). A ramp protocol was used in which power output was incremented at 0.5 W.s-1. The trials were separated by at least 48 hours. The perceived effort of breathing was obtained via Borg Category Ratio Scales at 3-min intervals and at fatigue. Oxygen consumption (VO2) and minute ventilation (VE) were monitored continuously. Breathing heliox did not change the sensation of dyspnoea, there were no differences between trials for the Borg scales at any time point. Exercise performance was not different between the nitrox and heliox trials (Peak PO = 451±58 W and 453±56 W) nor was maximal VO2 (4.96±0.61 L.min-1 and 4.88±0.65 L.min-1) or maximal VE (157±24 L.min-1 and 163±22 L.min-1). Between trial variability in peak PO was less than either VO2max or maximal VE. Breathing a less dense gas does not improve maximal exercise performance or reduce the perception of breathing effort in highly trained athletes. Although, an attenuated submaximal tidal volume and VE with a concomitant reduction in VO2 suggests an improved gas exchange and reduced O2 cost of ventilation when breathing heliox.

Key Words: fatigue, muscle contraction, perception, respiration, work


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Noakes, T. D. (2009). Last Word on Viewpoint: Evidence that reduced skeletal muscle recruitment explains the lactate paradox during exercise at high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 106: 745-745 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Hepatic oxygenation: rate-limiting factor in athletes.
Richard G Fiddian-Green
BJSM Online, 29 Jan 2007 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ