Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2006

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 18 August 2006. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.028258
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Classification of functional recovery of Anterior Cruciate Ligament copers, non-copers and adapters

Kate Button 1, Robert van Deursen 1* and Patricia Price 2

1 Cardiff University, United Kingdom
2 Wound Healing Reseaech Unit, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vandeursenr{at}cardiff.ac.uk.

Accepted 5 July 2006


Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify whether differences exist in the pattern of recovery with respect to functional outcomes for acutely ruptured anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) copers, adapters and non-copers. (2) To identify clinically relevant outcomes that could distinguish between 3 functional sub-groups.

METHODS: A longitudinal study was used to measure gait variables and distance hop at regular intervals following injury using a digital camcorder and computer for quantitative analysis. A sample of 63 ACLD subjects entered the study, 42 subjects were measured at least 3 times. At 12 to 36 months post injury individuals were classified as functional copers, adapters or non-copers based on which of their pre-injury activities they had resumed. To determine the pattern of recovery, repeated measurements were analysed using a least square fit of the data.

RESULTS: 17% of ACLD subjects were classified as functional copers, 45% as adapters and 38% as non-copers. Only 5% of people who participated in high demand activities pre-injury returned to them. ACLD copers recovered above the control mean for all gait variables by 40 days post injury. Hopping distance did not recover to the control mean. Non-copers struggled to recover to control limits and remained border line for all the gait variables.

CONCLUSIONS: Distinctive patterns of functional recovery for 3 sub-groups of ACL subjects have been identified. Gait variables and pre-injury activity level were the most useful variables to distinguish between the sub-groups. If an individuals potential for recovery is identifiable early post injury then appropriate treatment can be given.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament, function, measurement, recovery, rehabilitation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hurd, W. J., Axe, M. J., Snyder-Mackler, L. (2008). A 10-Year Prospective Trial of a Patient Management Algorithm and Screening Examination for Highly Active Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Part 1, Outcomes. Am J Sports Med 36: 40-47 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ