Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2007

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 18 May 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.037499
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Contact events in rugby union and their propensity to cause injury

Colin W Fuller 1*, John H M Brooks 2, Rebecca J Cancea 3, John Hall 3 and Simon PT Kemp 2

1 Centre for Sports Medicine, United Kingdom
2 Rugby Football Union, United Kingdom
3 PGIR Ltd, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: colin.fuller{at}nottingham.ac.uk.

Accepted 30 April 2007


Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of contact events in professional rugby union matches and to assess their propensity to cause injury.

Design: A 2-season (2003/2004 and 2005/2006) prospective cohort design.

Setting: 13 English Premiership rugby union clubs.

Participants: 645 professional rugby union players.

Main outcome measures: Incidence of match contact events (events per game); incidence (injuries per 1000 player-hours and per 1000 contact events), risk (days lost per 1000 player-hours and per 1000 contact events) and diagnosis of injury; referee’s decision.

Risk factors: Player-player contact, position on pitch and period of play.

Results: Tackles (221.0 events/game) and rucks (142.5) were the most common events and mauls (13.6%) and scrums (12.6%) the most penalised. Tackles (701.6 days/1,000 player-hours) were responsible for the greatest loss of time but scrums (213.2 days lost/ 1000 events) and collisions (199.8) presented the highest risk per event.

Conclusions: Tackles were the game event responsible for the highest number of injuries and the greatest loss of time in rugby union because they were by far the most common contact event. Collisions were seventy per cent more likely to result in an injury than a tackle and scrums carried a sixty per cent greater risk of injury than a tackle. The relative propensities for contact events to cause injury were rated as: lineout - very low; ruck - low; maul and tackle - average; collision and scrum - high.

Key Words: Tackle, collision, maul, ruck, scrum


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Commentary on "Contact events in rugby union and their propensity to cause injury"
Michael Sean Molloy
Br. J. Sports Med. 2007 41: 867. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Quarrie, K. L., Hopkins, W. G. (2008). Tackle Injuries in Professional Rugby Union. Am J Sports Med 36: 1705-1716 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kerr, H A, Curtis, C, Micheli, L J, Kocher, M S, Zurakowski, D, Kemp, S P T, Brooks, J H M (2008). Collegiate rugby union injury patterns in New England: a prospective cohort study. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 595-603 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fuller, C W, Laborde, F, Leather, R J, Molloy, M G (2008). International Rugby Board Rugby World Cup 2007 injury surveillance study. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 452-459 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ