Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 29 November 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.041467
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Evaluating SafeClub: Can risk management training improve the safety activities of community soccer clubs?

Kristy L Abbott 1*, Paul Klarenaar 2, Alex Donaldson 3 and Shauna Sherker 4

1 Youthsafe, Australia
2 Northern Sydney Central Coast Health, Australia
3 The University of Ballarat, Australia
4 NSW Injury Risk Management Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kristya{at}youthsafe.org.

Accepted 8 October 2007


Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a sports safety-focused risk management training program. Design: Controlled pre–post test. Setting: Four community soccer associations in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 76 clubs (32 intervention, 44 control) at baseline, 67 clubs (27, 40) at post season and 12 month follow-up. Intervention: SafeClub—a sports safety-focused risk management training program (3 x 2 hour sessions) based on adult learning principles and injury prevention concepts and models. Main outcome measures: Changes in mean Policy, Infrastructure and Safety scores as measured using a modified version of the Sports Safety Audit Tool. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean Policy, Infrastructure and Safety scores of intervention and control clubs at baseline. Intervention clubs achieved higher post-season mean Policy (11.9 intervention vs. 7.5 controls), Infrastructure (15.2 vs. 10.3) and Safety (27.0 vs. 17.8) scores when compared with controls. These differences were greater at 12 month follow-up: Policy (16.4 vs. 7.6); Infrastructure (24.7 vs. 10.7); and Safety (41.1 vs. 18.3). General Linear Modelling indicated that intervention clubs achieved statistically significantly higher Policy (p<0.001), Infrastructure (p<0.001) and Safety (p<0.001) scores when compared to control clubs at post-season and 12 month follow-up. There was also a significant linear interaction of Time and Group for all three scores: Policy (p<0.001), Infrastructure (p<0.001) and Safety (p<0.001). Conclusions: SafeClub effectively assisted clubs to improve their sports safety activities, particularly the foundations and processes for good risk management practice, in a sustainable way.

Key Words: Sports injuries, community, risk management, soccer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ