Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2008

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 28 February 2008. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.045377
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Paper

Concurrent inspiratory muscle and cardiovascular training differentially improves both perceptions of effort and 5000-m running performance compared to cardiovascular training alone

Andrew M Edwards 1*, Carl Wells 2 and Ronald Butterly 3

1 UCOL Institute of Technology, New Zealand
2 Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom
3 Leeds Metropolitan University, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.m.edwards{at}ucol.ac.nz.

Accepted 22 January 2008


Abstract

Objective: To examine whether inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is a useful additional training aid with which to augment cardiovascular exercise training adaptations. <br> Methods: Sixteen healthy untrained males agreed to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to training (TRA; n=8) and placebo (PLA; n=8) groups. Pre- and post-training measurements of spirometry and maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP) were taken in addition to 1) maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) 2) 5000-m run time-trial. All subjects completed the same four-week cardiovascular training programme which consisted of three running sessions (CV1: 5 x 1000-m, CV2: 3 x 1600-m, SP1: 20-min run) in each of the four weeks. IMT was performed daily by both groups using an inspiratory muscle trainer (POWERbreathe). TRA completed 30 maximal inspirations while PLA inspired 30 times against a negligible resistance. <br> Results: Mean MIP increased significantly in both groups (TRA: 14.9 ±6.8%, PLA: 8.0 ±7.4%) from pre- to post-training (P<0.01) but was not significantly related to changes in running performance. Mean CV1 training-repetition runs improved similarly in both groups, but RPE evaluations were significantly reduced in TRA (15.7 ±0.7) compared to PLA (16.6 ±0.8) at week four (P<0.05). Pre- to post-training changes in VO2 max were well-matched between both TRA (+2.2 ±2.3%) and PLA (+1.5 ±2.4%) while post-intervention 5000-m performance was significantly augmented in TRA compared with PLA (TRA: -4.3 ±1.6%, PLA: -2.2 ±1.9% P<0.05). <br> Conclusions: The addition of IMT to a cardiovascular training programme augments 5000-m running performance but exerts no additional influence over VO2 max compared with a cardiovascular-training group. This is probably due to IMT-induced reductions in perceived effort at high ventilatory rates which is of greater consequence to longer duration time-trial performances than incremental tests of VO2 max.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ