Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

Electronic Letters to:

Henrik Zetterberg, Michael Jonsson, Abdullah Rasulzada, Cornel Popa, Ewa Styrud, Max Albert Hietala, Lars Rosengren, Anders Wallin, Kaj Blennow
No neurochemical evidence for brain injury caused by heading in soccer
Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 574-577 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Authors reply re: The wrong ball
Henrik Zetterberg   (3 November 2008)
[Read eLetter] The wrong ball: old soccer balls much heavier and stiffer than modern
Lars H Breimer   (31 October 2008)

Authors reply re: The wrong ball 3 November 2008
Previous eLetter  Top
Henrik Zetterberg,
Associate Professor of Neurochemistry
The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg

Send letter to journal:
Re: Authors reply re: The wrong ball

henrik.zetterberg{at}gu.se Henrik Zetterberg

Reply: Right type of ball used in study

This is a forward-looking study in which modern day footballs were employed to assess the possible impact on the brain by heading. Old style heavy footballs, however, may well have been associated with brain damage as pointed out by Dr Breimer.

That the brains of woodpeckers would be full of plaques and signs of neuronal damage is a tall story. One case of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (a very common and unspecific ageing sign) has been reported in an aged great spotted woodpecker (Nakayama H, et al., Neurobiol Aging. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):53-6). In contrast, the woodpecker is very well adapted by evolution to repeated head blows by different anatomical structures that protect the brain (see May PR, et al., Lancet. 1976 Feb 28;1(7957):454-5; and Schwab IR, Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86;843 for examples).

The wrong ball: old soccer balls much heavier and stiffer than modern 31 October 2008
 Next eLetter Top
Lars H Breimer,
Consultant Physician
Dept of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital

Send letter to journal:
Re: The wrong ball: old soccer balls much heavier and stiffer than modern

lars.breimer{at}orebroll.se Lars H Breimer

Dear Editor

It could be argued that this study has been performed with the wrong type of ball, one unlikely to reflect the type of brain stress inflicted on old footballers, because the old style ball absorbed dampness from the grass and became increasingly heavy and stiff, even if it had not been raining; on a rainy day the weight had increased a lot by the end of the match. Such balls needed power to kick, yet, as a corollary, they flew like cannonballs and were hard for goalies to stop, so many goals were scored towards the end of the match, often from distance shots. Heading them was something else.

I seem to remember that the brains of woodpeckers are full of plaques and signs of neuronal damage. Albeit that woodpeckers need not solve differential equations or even remember their latin names, notwithstanding they may be suitable models to study for serum biomarkers of repetitive brain trauma. Given that one would be studying the natural behaviour of woodpeckers ethics approval should be straightforward while repeating the study with a thoroughly doused old-style football might present a challenge.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of BASEM

Official journal of ECOSEP

Available online to all members of ACSP, AMSSM and SMNZ