Article Text

PDF

Management of the sprained ankle
  1. C N van Dijk
  1. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr van Dijk, Orthopaedic Research Centre, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
 M.Lammerts{at}amc.uva.nl

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Non-operative treatment with early functional rehabilitation is the treatment of choice

Inversion injuries of the ankle ligament are among the most common injuries, accounting for about 25% of all injuries to the musculoskeletal system. The most commonly injured part of the lateral ligament complex is the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). Although ruptures of the ankle ligaments are very common, treatment selection remains controversial. In a recent systematic review of the available literature, it was found that treatment of an acute lateral ligament rupture that was too short in duration or that did not include sufficient support of the ankle joint tended to result in more residual symptoms. It was concluded that a “no treatment” strategy for acute ruptures of the lateral ankle ligament leads to more residual symptoms.1 After a supination trauma, it is therefore important to distinguish a simple distortion from an acute grade II or III ankle ligament rupture, because adequate treatment is associated with a better prognosis.

Although ruptures of the ankle ligament are very common, treatment selection remains controversial.

Because of the suspected poor reliability of physical diagnosis of ligament ruptures after inversion trauma of the ankle, stress radiography, arthrography, magnetic resonance imaging, and sonography are often performed simultaneously.2 However, these methods are expensive, and their reliability is debatable. The reliability of physical examination can be enhanced when the investigation is repeated a few days after the trauma. The accuracy of physical examination has been determined in a series of 160 patients, comparing physical examination performed within 48 hours of the injury and five days after injury. All patients had arthrography, but the outcome was not disclosed to the patient or the investigator until after the second delayed physical examination. The specificity and sensitivity of the delayed physical examination for the presence of absence of a lateral ankle ligament rupture were 84% and 96% respectively. It is therefore concluded that a precise clinical diagnosis is possible.3,4

The most important features of physical examination are swelling, haematoma discoloration, pain on palpation, and the anterior drawer test. Physical examination is unreliable in the acute situation because of the pain: the anterior drawer test cannot be adequately performed. Moreover there is diffuse pain on palpation and it is often difficult to judge whether the cause of the swelling is oedema or haematoma. A few days after the trauma, the swelling and pain have diminished and it becomes obvious whether the cause of the swelling was oedema or haematoma. The pain on palpation has become more localised and the anterior drawer test can be performed.

The site of pain on palpation is important. If there is no pain on palpation on the ATFL, there is no acute lateral ligament rupture.4 Pain on palpation on the ATFL cannot in itself distinguish between a rupture or a distortion. If there is pain on palpation on the ATFL and haematoma discoloration, however, there is a 90% chance that there is an acute lateral ligament rupture.4

A positive anterior drawer test has a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 97%.5–9 It is sometimes possible to detect the occurrence of a skin dimple when performing the anterior drawer test. If a skin dimple does occur during the anterior drawer test, there is a high correlation with a rupture of the lateral ligaments (predictive value 94%). A skin dimple will occur, however, in only 50% of patients with a lateral ankle ligament rupture.6 A positive anterior drawer test in combination with pain on palpation on the ATFL and haematoma discoloration has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 77%. It has been shown that the interobserver variation for the delayed physical examination is good with an average κ of 0.7.5

When a diagnosis has been made, it is generally agreed that non-operative treatment with early functional rehabilitation is the treatment of choice.2 A recent meta-analysis showed operative treatment to be superior to functional treatment.1 There are reasons to question the selection of operative treatment as a treatment of choice. Operative treatment is associated with increased risk of complications and is also associated with higher costs. Because of the high prevalence of ankle injuries, operative treatment may be performed by surgeons in training, which may affect the outcome. Finally when conservative treatment fails, secondary operative reconstruction of the elongated ligaments can be performed with similar good results, even years after the initial injury.10 Functional treatment therefore remains the treatment of choice.

Delayed physical examination provides a diagnostic modality of high sensitivity and specificity

Application of an inelastic tape bandage is only effective when it is applied at the moment that the swelling has diminished. This kind of treatment is cheap and not a burden to the patient. The same is true for delayed physical examination. Before the decision is made to apply the inelastic bandage or a lace up support, a delayed physical examination must be performed to obtain a diagnosis and to decide whether this treatment is really necessary. Does performing an anterior drawer test four to five days after injury disturb wound healing? Cell lysis, granulation, and phagocyte activity take up to six days to occur after injury, and fibroblasts start to grow into the wound at five days. Subsequently, collagen grows along a fibrin mesh. After 10 days, the defect is filled with vascular inflammatory tissue.11,12 Performing an anterior drawer test four to five days after the trauma will therefore not disturb wound healing. Delayed physical examination provides a diagnostic modality of high sensitivity and specificity. This has been proposed to be the strategy of choice in an editorial of the British Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.13

Non-operative treatment with early functional rehabilitation is the treatment of choice

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.