Effect of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) closed cell foam on transmitted forces in mouthguard material
- 1Private practitioner
- 2Engineer
- 3Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- 4Department of Dentistry, University of Queensland
- Correspondence to: Dr Westerman, 500 Sandgate Road, Clayfield 4011, Queensland, Australia; airgard{at}mgard.com.au
- Accepted 31 October 2001
Abstract
Objectives: To compare transmitted forces through ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguard material and the same EVA material with gas inclusions in the form of a closed cell foam.
Method: EVA mouthguard materials with and without foam gas inclusions and 4 mm thick were impacted with a constant force from an impact pendulum. Various porosity levels in the foam materials were produced by 1%, 5%, and 10% by weight foaming agent. The forces transmitted through the EVA after energy absorption by the test materials were measured with a force sensor and compared.
Results: Only minor non-significant differences in transmitted forces through the EVA with and without foam were shown.
Conclusions: The inclusion of gas in the form of a closed cell foam in 4 mm thick EVA mouthguard materials did not improve the impact performance of the EVA mouthguard material.







