Article Text

PDF

Tibial shaft fractures in amateur footballers
  1. B Lenehan,
  2. P Fleming,
  3. S Walsh,
  4. K Kaar
  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Merlin Park Regional Hospital, Galway, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Mr Lenehan, 7 Weston Green Lucan, Co Dublin, Republic Of Ireland; 
 brian{at}blenehan.com

Abstract

Background: Footballers constitute a unique group of patients with tibial shaft fractures. They tend to have excellent general health and well developed musculature in the leg, and their fractures are generally closed injuries caused by low velocity trauma. However, little has been reported on the outcome after tibial shaft fractures in this group.

Objective: To identify patterns of injury, response to treatment, and functional outcome in such a group.

Method: Fifty consecutive tibial shaft fractures in adult footballers treated at Merlin Park Regional Hospital over a five year period were analysed.

Results: Most of the fractures were type A injuries (AO/ASIF classification). The incidence of complications was low. All patients reported good or excellent satisfaction with their outcome. However, only 54% of patients returned to playing competitive football.

Conclusion: Tibial shaft fractures in amateur footballers are associated with good results when traditional outcome criteria are used, but many patients do not regain their previous level of function.

  • tibial shaft fractures
  • football
  • amateur
  • outcome

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Although the surgical treatment of tibial shaft fractures has changed considerably over the past 20 years, their management continues to be greatly influenced by the type of fracture, the surrounding soft tissues, the general health of the patient, the motivation and compliance of the patient with rehabilitation, and the expectations of the patient.1 For these reasons, footballers constitute a unique group of patients. They tend to have excellent general health, well developed musculature in the leg, and a high level of function, which they may reasonably expect to regain after successful treatment.

We reviewed 50 consecutive tibial shaft fractures in adult footballers treated at our hospital over a five year period, and attempted to identify patterns of injury, response to treatment, and functional outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients treated at our hospital for a tibial shaft fracture sustained playing amateur football, between January 1995 and December 1999, were included in this study. Patients were playing either association football (soccer) or gaelic football when injured. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to establish the mechanism of injury, the type of fracture and mode of treatment, and the incidence of complications. Follow up data were collected by telephone questionnaire. Patients were asked to describe their level of satisfaction with the outcome (poor, moderate, good, or excellent), and whether they had returned to playing competitive football.

RESULTS

Fifty male amateur footballers with a tibial shaft fracture were treated at our hospital during the period of the study. Their mean age was 20.8 years (range 16–33). The right tibia was fractured in 76% of cases (38 patients) and the left in 24%. In most cases (68%), the mechanism of injury included a tackle or kick by another player (table 1). Fewer than 40% of players were wearing shinguards.

Table 1

Mechanism of injury

Most of the fractures (82.5%) in our series were type A (table 2) when classified by the AO/ASIF system (table 3). Only five fractures (12.5%) were type B, and two (5%) were type C.

Table 2

Type of fracture

Table 3

AO/ASIF classification of tibia shaft fractures2

There was one compound fracture (Gustilo grade 1; table 4).

Table 4

Classification of open fractures3

All patients were admitted to hospital for management. The mean hospital stay was 5.3 days (range 1–23). Half were treated by closed manipulation and immobilisation in an above knee cast. Above knee casts were applied by qualified plaster technicians, and a standardised regimen was followed. The casts were maintained for eight weeks, and patients remained non-weight bearing throughout. The casts were then removed, and patellar bearing casts were applied for four to six weeks or until union was achieved. Partial weight bearing was allowed (10% of body weight) during this time, and patients were instructed by a physiotherapist. Some 44% (22 patients) were treated by reamed Russel Taylor intramedullary nail fixation. Partial weight bearing (10% of body weight) was permitted for the first six weeks, progressing to full weight bearing thereafter as tolerated.

Open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws was performed in three patients (6%). These patients remained non-weight bearing for six weeks; partial weight bearing (10% of body weight) was then allowed, progressing to full weight bearing at 10–12 weeks.

A review of the patients’ charts showed that eight had serious complications related to their injury and treatment (table 5). Three patients developed a compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy. Two patients had respiratory complications related to fat embolism, and required observation and supportive care in a high dependency unit. One wound infection occurred at the site of the distal locking screw in a patient who was treated by intramedullary nailing. Only one fracture did not unite after primary conservative treatment, and required open reduction and internal plate fixation.

Table 5

Complications of tibial shaft fractures

Forty of the 50 patients were available for follow up interview. The mean follow up period was 30 months (range 11–57). All patients reported good or excellent function in the injured limb, but only 54% returned to playing competitive football and only 44% returned to playing football at their previous level of competition. The average length of time before patients returned to sport was 11.6 months (range 6–18). The likelihood of returning to football was not significantly related to the age of the patient, the type of fracture, or the particular football code.

DISCUSSION

Footballers constitute a well defined subgroup of patients with tibial shaft fractures, differing from many other patients in areas that are relevant to recovery from their injury. These injuries are common,4–7 and a typical fracture pattern occurs in most cases which can be classified as type A2 or A3 in the AO/ASIF classification system (table 3). This is consistent with the mechanism of injury (low velocity impact or rotational torque) and with previous attempts in the literature to define a “footballer’s fracture”.4 We had hypothesised that rotational injuries would be more common in soccer than in gaelic football, because pivoting knee movements are more common in the former, but this proved not to be the case. Nor did shin pads, worn predominantly by the soccer players, prevent tibial fractures, although the direct impact mechanism caused fewer fractures in this group.

We had also hypothesised that this group of patients would have a more developed leg muscle mass than other patients with tibial shaft fractures, and thus may have a higher incidence of compartment syndrome and other soft tissue complications. Three patients (6%) developed compartment syndrome, but in two of these the problem developed 24 hours after intramedullary nailing and appeared to be a complication of the surgical procedure rather than of the fracture itself. All three patients had direct intracompartmental pressure measurements recorded using a Stryker measurement device. Two patients developed a fat embolism syndrome requiring active supportive measures. Diagnosis was made using Gurd’s criteria5 (table 6). Each patient had at least one major criterion and four minor criteria. This rate (4%) is lower than that reported by Ganong,6 who found that 19% of patients in his study of young otherwise healthy skiers with isolated tibial shaft fractures developed fat embolism syndrome. The low incidence of non-union (2%) is probably attributable to the low velocity fracture pattern, the preponderance of closed injuries, the low mean age of the study population, and the well developed soft tissue envelope in these patients.

Table 6

Gurd’s criteria for the diagnosis of fat embolism syndrome

It is noteworthy that only 54% of patients returned to playing competitive football after their injury, with only 44% returning to their previous level. The reasons for this were varied (table 7). However, most patients were satisfied with the outcome of their treatment. Shaw et al7 reported a 93.2% return to sport, with 74% reporting unimpaired function, but did not differentiate amateur from professional footballers. Professional footballers have additional incentives to return to playing at a high level, and perhaps have access to more intensive rehabilitative programmes than their amateur counterparts.

Table 7

Stated reason for not returning to football

Take home message

Our findings suggest that tibial fractures in amateur footballers have a good outcome when assessed by traditional criteria (early morbidity, complication rate, time to union, and patient satisfaction) but not in terms of returning to sport. Doctors and patients should be aware of this when discussing treatment and rehabilitation.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.