Article Text

PDF

Postactivation potentiation: role in performance
  1. D Sale
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Sale
 Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Ivor Wynne Centre, Room AB 117, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada; saledmcmaster.ca

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The role of postactivation potentiation in enhancement of strength and speed performance requires further research

Postactivation potentiation (PAP), also known as activity-dependent potentiation, is an increase in muscle isometric twitch and low frequency tetanic force following a “conditioning” activity.1,2 Examples of conditioning activity are a series of evoked isometric twitches (staircase or treppe), an evoked isometric tetanic contraction (post-tetanic potentiation), a sustained isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and a series of dynamic contractions. In fact, any type of contractile activity is likely to activate the mechanism of PAP—that is, phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains, which increases Ca2+ sensitivity of the myofilaments.2 The result is an amplified level of myosin cross bridge activity in response to submaximal concentrations of myoplasmic Ca2+. A notable feature of PAP is that it has no effect on the force of high frequency tetanic isometric contractions, because in such contractions a “saturating” concentration of Ca2+ is attained, making any increase in Ca2+ sensitivity inconsequential. Although less studied, PAP also increases the force of shortening (concentric) contractions,3 and the highest frequency at which PAP is effective is greater for rapid shortening (concentric) contractions than for isometric contractions.4

On the basis of the foregoing, it would appear that PAP has its greatest effect on performance in which motor units are firing at relatively low frequencies, such as endurance exercise. Endurance performance typically consists of submaximal contractions that are repeated for prolonged periods. From the beginning of performance, the contractions themselves would activate the mechanism responsible for PAP. In these submaximal contractions, motor units would be discharging at relatively low rates; thus, the force output of the motor units should be increased by PAP. If a constant force has to be maintained, motor unit firing rates would have to decrease to compensate for the increased force. A decrease in motor unit firing rate could, by reducing the number of nerve impulses and muscle action potentials per unit time, delay the onset of fatigue. For example, the risk of neuromuscular transmission failure, muscle action potential propagation failure, and excitation-contraction coupling impairment is increased in proportion to the frequency of nerve/muscle action potentials that must be sustained. By reducing the required frequency, PAP should delay fatigue. In sustained exercise, there is also the possibility of impaired “central drive” to motoneurones. By increasing the force output for a given motor unit firing rate, PAP could relieve the burden of maintaining a high level of excitation of the motoneurones.

PAP may have a special role in compensating for the impaired excitation-contraction coupling that occurs with fatigue. Impaired excitation-contraction coupling is responsible for low frequency fatigue—that is, a disproportionate loss of low frequency tetanic force. This is the exact opposite of PAP, which is a disproportionate increase in low frequency tetanic force. Thus, PAP may compensate for low frequency fatigue.5 Although many endurance activities, such as running, cycling, swimming, consist of repeated brief concentric or eccentric-concentric actions in which motor units discharge briefly at fairly high rates, it should be recalled that in concentric (compared with isometric) actions, PAP and perhaps low frequency fatigue can act at higher frequencies.

Strength and speed performance typically requires that, in a brief maximal effort, all relevant motor units are recruited and firing at maximum possible rates. PAP would appear to offer little benefit when motor units are discharging at very high rates, because it cannot increase high frequency force. However, it has an additional effect; it can increase isometric rate of force development, even at relatively high stimulation frequencies at which isometric force is not increased by PAP.1 Furthermore, in fast shortening contractions, the effect of PAP is present at still higher frequencies.4 Whether PAP is effective at the motor unit firing rates attained in fast “ballistic” performance is at present not known. Nevertheless, by increasing the rate of force development, it could enhance performance in activities such as jumping, kicking, and throwing.

There are reports6–8 of improved performance of this nature after a conditioning activity such as isometric MVCs or a set of repetitions with a heavy weight, but the results have been inconsistent. The inconsistency may be the result of variation in the performance to be improved, the conditioning activity, and the time interval between the conditioning activity and the performance.

In exploiting PAP to enhance strength and speed performance, two dilemmas must be resolved. Firstly, a more intense and prolonged conditioning activity may activate the PAP mechanism to a greater extent, but it also produces greater fatigue. The second dilemma is that the longer the recovery period between the end of the conditioning activity and the beginning of performance, the greater the recovery from fatigue, but also the greater the decay of the PAP mechanism. The two dilemmas can only be resolved by trial and error. In one study9 for example, the recovery period after a 10 second isometric MVC was only 15 seconds, so that performance (dynamic knee extension) would begin when PAP (assessed by the force of twitch contraction) was still near its maximum. However, performance was actually depressed because of fatigue induced by the conditioning activity. This was an example of low frequency (isometric twitch) force being increased at the same time as high frequency (concentric) force, and velocity was depressed. If a longer recovery period had been selected, say three minutes, performance may have been improved as suggested by some studies.6,7

An additional consideration is that, when the performance is a series of contractions, the contractions themselves have a cumulative effect in mobilising the PAP mechanism.9,10 This may partly explain the progressive increase in performance observed in a series of jumps8 or dynamic knee extensions.9,10 It has also been shown that the effects of a conditioning activity and repeated performance have an additive effect on the magnitude of PAP, at least over a few repetitions of the performance.9 In fact, if the performance consists of enough trials, the PAP induced by the trials themselves may rival that of the conditioning activity, making the latter unnecessary.10 Again, all of this has to be sorted out by trial and error experiments, which should be the basis for future research.

The role of postactivation potentiation in enhancement of strength and speed performance requires further research

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.