rss
Br J Sports Med 2004;38:e23 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.010553
  • Electronic pages

Are sports medicine journals relevant and applicable to practitioners and athletes?

  1. C Bleakley1,
  2. D MacAuley2,
  3. S McDonough1
  1. 1University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Northern Ireland, UK
  2. 2Hillhead Surgery, Belfast, Northern Ireland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr S M McDonough
 University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey BT38 0QB, UK
  • Accepted 13 January 2004

Abstract

Objective: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research and assess how relevant and applicable it is to everyday practice.

Methods: Original research articles, short reports, and case reports published in four major sport and exercise medicine journals were studied and classified according to the main topic of study and type of subjects used.

Results: The most common topic was sports science, and very few studies related to the treatment of injuries and medical conditions. The majority of published articles used healthy subjects sampled from the sedentary population, and few studies have been carried out on injured participants.

Conclusions: There is a dearth of studies addressing diagnostic and treatment interventions in the sports medicine literature. The evidence base for sports medicine must continue to increase in terms of volume and quality.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.