rss
Br J Sports Med 2005;39:232-236 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.014282
  • Original article

Effects of montelukast on airway narrowing from eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation and cold air exercise

  1. K W Rundell1,
  2. B A Spiering2,
  3. J M Baumann1,
  4. T M Evans1
  1. 1Human Performance Laboratory, Marywood University, Scranton, PA, USA
  2. 2University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Rundell
 Human Performance Laboratory, Marywood University, 2300 Adams Avenue, Scranton, PA 18509, USA; rundellmarywood.edu
  • Accepted 7 September 2004

Abstract

Background: Exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common in elite athletes. Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) is a laboratory test recommended for the identification of EIB in athletes, secondary to a field exercise challenge. Montelukast attenuates EIB, but its protective effect against airway narrowing from EVH has not been investigated.

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of montelukast after exercise and after EVH.

Methods: A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, crossover study was performed with 11 physically active EIB positive subjects (eight men, three women; mean (SD) age 22.8 (6.8) years). Six hours before each of the following challenges 10 mg montelukast or placebo was ingested: (a) a six minute, cold air (−3°C) maximal effort work accumulation cycle ergometer exercise; (b) EVH, breathing 5% CO2 compressed air at 85% maximal voluntary ventilation for six minutes. Spirometry was performed before and 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the challenge. At least 48 hours was observed between challenges.

Results: No differences in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were found after the two challenges. Exercise and EVH resulted in falls in FEV1 of 22.4 (18.0) and 25.6 (16.8) respectively. Falls in FEV1 after montelukast were less than after placebo (10.6 (10.6) and 14.3 (11.3) after exercise and EVH respectively; p<0.05). Montelukast provided protection against bronchoconstriction (59% and 53%; p<0.05) for eight exercising subjects and 10 EVH subjects; no protection was afforded for three exercising and one EVH challenged subject.

Conclusions: Both exercise and EVH were potent stimuli of airway narrowing. A single dose of montelukast provided reasonable protection in attenuating bronchoconstriction from either exercise or EVH. The similar protection by montelukast suggests that EVH is a suitable laboratory surrogate for EIB evaluation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.