rss
Br J Sports Med 2005;39:e20 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.015438
  • Electronic pages

Motivation and satisfaction among polyclinic volunteers at the 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games

  1. J C Reeser1,
  2. R L Berg2,
  3. D Rhea3,
  4. S Willick4
  1. 1Marshfield Clinic Department of Physical Medicine, Marshfield, WI, USA
  2. 2Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield
  3. 3Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA
  4. 4University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Reeser
 Marshfield Clinic Department of Physical Medicine, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA; reeser.jonathanmarshfieldclinic.org
  • Accepted 23 November 2004

Abstract

Background: The Olympic and Paralympic Games rely heavily on volunteers to provide many essential services, including medical care of athletes.

Objective: This preliminary investigation sought to characterise the motivational influences and factors responsible for the satisfaction of Olympic and Paralympic healthcare volunteers.

Methods: The 2002 Winter Games polyclinic healthcare volunteers were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to elicit information about their motives for volunteering and the factors that contributed to their satisfaction with their volunteer experience.

Results: There was no significant difference in the motivation or satisfaction summary scores based on event worked. There was a strong positive correlation between motivation and satisfaction. Physician respondents had a lower mean motivation score than did non-physician volunteers.

Conclusions: There were no significant motivational differences between Olympic and Paralympic volunteers, but there were several differences noted between physician and non-physician volunteers. The 2002 polyclinic volunteers appear to have been motivated by a complex process best described as “enlightened self interest,” and all were generally well satisfied with their experience. These results may assist organisers of future Games in selecting appropriately motivated volunteer personnel and creating rewarding work environments for them.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: no author or related institution has received any financial benefit from research in this study.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.