rss
Br J Sports Med 39:i40-i48 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.019174

Effectiveness of headgear in football

  1. C Withnall1,
  2. N Shewchenko1,
  3. M Wonnacott1,
  4. J Dvorak2
  1. 1Biokinetics and Associates Ltd, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Center, Zurich, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to:
 C Withnall
 Biokinetics and Associates Ltd, Ontario, Canada; withnallbiokinetics.com

    Abstract

    Objectives: Commercial headgear is currently being used by football players of all ages and skill levels to provide protection from heading and direct impact. The clinical and biomechanical effectiveness of the headgear in attenuating these types of impact is not well defined or understood. This study was conducted to determine whether football headgear has an effect on head impact responses.

    Methods: Controlled laboratory tests were conducted with a human volunteer and surrogate head/neck system. The impact attenuation of three commercial headgears during ball impact speeds of 6–30 m/s and in head to head contact with a closing speed of 2–5 m/s was quantified. The human subject, instrumented to measure linear and angular head accelerations, was exposed to low severity impacts during heading in the unprotected and protected states. High severity heading contact and head to head impacts were studied with a biofidelic surrogate headform instrumented to measure linear and angular head responses. Subject and surrogate responses were compared with published injury assessment functions associated with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

    Results: For ball impacts, none of the headgear provided attenuation over the full range of impact speeds. Head responses with or without headgear were not significantly different (p>0.05) and remained well below levels associated with MTBI. In head to head impact tests the headgear provided an overall 33% reduction in impact response.

    Conclusion: The football headgear models tested did not provide benefit during ball impact. This is probably because of the large amount of ball deformation relative to headband thickness. However, the headgear provided measurable benefit during head to head impacts.

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: none declared

    • Ethical approval was not obtained for this study because the one volunteer, who is also coauthor of this paper, agreed to head footballs wearing various headgear. He was the only human subject.

    Latest from BJSM blog

    Latest from BJSM blog

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJSM.
    View free sample issue >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.


  • BJSM blog now on Kindle