Article Text


Hyperinsulinaemia, hyperaminoacidaemia and post-exercise muscle anabolism: the search for the optimal recovery drink
  1. A H Manninen
  1. Advanced Research Press, Inc, Setauket, NY, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Manninen
 Advanced Research Press, Inc, 690 Route 25A, Setauket, NY 11733, USA; sportsnutrition{at}


Dietary supplements and other ergogenic aids are popular among athletes. Recent studies have shown that nutritional mixtures containing protein hydrolysates, added leucine, and high-glycaemic carbohydrates greatly augment insulin secretion compared with high-glycaemic carbohydrates only. When post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia is supported by hyperaminoacidaemia induced by protein hydrolysate and leucine ingestion, net protein deposition in muscle should occur. Thus, consumption of post-exercise recovery drinks containing these nutrients in conjunction with appropriate resistance training may lead to increased skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength. However, the long-term effects on body composition and exercise performance remain to be determined.

Statistics from

 “The importance of nutrition following training-induced homeostatic disruption can be traced to our most ancient of writings. Esau, the first born of Isaac, in what is estimated to be 1800 bc appears to have had incredible genetics. His training sessions, however, were not found in the gym, but rather in the field as he hunted the most ferocious of beasts. So vital was the post-workout meal to the father of the Edomites that he sold his birthright to his brother Jacob for it!”1

Appropriate resistance exercise leads to significant skeletal muscle hypertrophy, which can occur through an increase in protein synthesis, a decrease in protein degradation, or both. Although stimulation—that is, resistance exercise—is important for muscle hypertrophy, nutrient availability appears to be a critical factor regulating the degree of hypertrophy. Obviously, the hormonal milieu of the muscle also has a major impact on protein synthesis.

It is now apparent that both increased insulin and increased availability of amino acids are important for maximizing muscle protein anabolism. If hyperinsulinaemia is not supported by an exogenous amino acid supply, plasma as well as muscle free amino acid concentrations fall because of reduced splanchnic release.2 On the other hand, if amino acid concentrations are maintained at normal or higher concentrations, net protein deposition in muscle will occur because of stimulation of synthesis and possibly because of a simultaneous decrease in breakdown.2

The importance of amino acid availability for the stimulatory effects of insulin to be evident was highlighted by Bennet et al,3 who reported that insulin, given with sufficient amino acids, can stimulate leg and whole body protein balance by mechanisms including stimulation of protein synthesis and inhibition of protein breakdown. This is in line with the recent data obtained by Borsheim et al,4 who showed that protein balance over the muscle remains negative after resistance exercise when only carbohydrate (CHO) is ingested. In sharp contrast, amino acid ingestion alone significantly increases muscle protein anabolism after resistance exercise.5 However, consumption of both amino acids and CHO results in much greater effects on muscle protein anabolism,6 suggesting an interactive effect between insulin, amino acid availability, and resistance exercise. Also, it is well established that the stimulatory effect of amino acids on muscle protein synthesis is greater after exercise than at rest.7 Thus, nutrient timing is also an important consideration.8,9,10,11

Given the fact that raising the plasma insulin concentration is key to stimulating muscle protein synthesis and limiting protein catabolism after exercise,12 it is not surprising that some athletes abuse insulin to increase skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Insulin injections reportedly can produce “rapid and noticeable [muscle] growth... almost immediately after starting insulin therapy”.13 Most athletes choose to administer insulin immediately after a workout13; they apparently realise that it is the most anabolic time to use this hormone. However, insulin abuse is extremely risky—one mistake in dose or diet can be fatal. Fortunately, recent studies have focused on safe insulinotropic nutritional mixtures containing protein hydrolysates, certain added amino acids (especially leucine), and high-glycaemic CHO—for example, dextrose and maltodextrine.14–18

In this review, I propose that post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia supported by protein hydrolysate and leucine ingestion-induced hyperaminoacidaemia increases net protein deposition in muscle, leading to increased skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength, when combined with appropriate resistance training. Firstly, this review provides some information on (1) amino acid-stimulated insulin secretion, (2) the effects of leucine on post-exercise muscle protein synthesis, and (3) protein hydrolysates. Then studies examining the effects of insulinotropic nutritional mixtures on insulin secretion, nitrogen utilisation, and post-exercise muscle protein anabolism are reviewed. Finally, the effects of post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia on fat oxidation and de novo lipogenesis are discussed.


Formerly, it was believed that insulin secretion was controlled almost entirely by blood glucose concentration. However, it later become apparent that amino acids also play a very important role in controlling insulin secretion. Certain amino acids cause insulin release in humans even under conditions where the blood sugar changes little from its basal level.19 However, changes in blood sugar concentrations markedly influence the responsiveness of beta cells to individual amino acids. Studies on isolated perfused rat pancreas and islets have shown that physiological amino acid mixtures and even pharmacological concentrations of individual amino acids require the presence of permissive concentrations of glucose (2.5–5.0 mM) to be effective beta cell stimulants.19 However, leucine is an exception.20 Contrary to popular belief, oral arginine is not an effective insulin secretagogue.14


The key branched-chain amino acid leucine acts as a nutrient signal to stimulate muscle protein anabolism. Leucine affects muscle protein metabolism by decreasing the rate of protein degradation,21 probably by increasing circulating insulin. In addition, leucine affects phosphorylation of key proteins involved in the regulation of protein synthesis, which has been shown to occur even in the absence of an increase in circulating insulin.23 After exercise, recovery of muscle protein synthesis requires dietary protein or branched-chain amino acids to increase tissue concentrations of leucine.24 The important bottom line is that insulin and leucine allow skeletal muscle to coordinate protein synthesis with physiological state and dietary intake.24 For more detailed reviews, see the recent papers by Norton and Layman,24 Blomstrand et al25 and Garlick.26


Protein hydrolysates are produced from purified protein sources by heating with acid or, preferably, addition of proteolytic enzymes, followed by purification procedures.27 Extreme bitterness is a negative attribute of most protein hydrolysates. Fortunately, specific “debittering” strategies have focused on the application of proline-specific exopeptidases and endopeptidases given the contribution of proline residues to hydrolysate bitterness.28 The hydrolytic process mimics our own digestive actions; thus some feel it is an ideal way to process dietary protein. Extensively hydrolysed proteins containing mostly dipeptides and tripeptides are absorbed more rapidly than free-form amino acids and much more rapidly than intact (non-hydrolysed) proteins.27,29,31 The considerably greater absorption rate of amino acids from dipeptides and tripeptides than from an amino acid mixture appears to be the result of uptake by a system that has a greater transport capacity than the amino acid carrier system, thus minimising competition between its substrates.29 Each protein hydrolysate is a complex mixture of peptides of different chain length together with free amino acids, which can be defined by a global value known as degree of hydrolysis, which is the fraction of peptide bonds that have been cleaved in the starter protein.32 However, two protein hydrolysates made by different methods—for example, oligopeptides/significant free amino acids versus mainly dipeptides and tripeptides—may have a similar degree of hydrolysis even though their absorption kinetics are probably quite different.33 Consequently, it has been suggested that it is better to use the term “peptide chain length profile”.33

It seems that only dipeptides and tripeptides, which remain after luminal and brush-border peptidase digestion, are absorbed intact.34 Tetrapeptides and higher peptides appear to require prior brush-border hydrolysis before their hydrolysis products can be absorbed.34 Although the starter protein and method of hydrolysis affect absorptive characteristics, the peptide chain length is the most important variable. Protein hydrolysates produced from various sources showed increased amino acid absorption in humans when the proportion of dipeptides and tripeptides was increased.34 Thus, to maximise absorption rate, the ideal protein hydrolysate should contain mainly dipeptides and tripeptides. Such a protein hydrolysate seems to produce the most immediate hyperaminoacidaemia. In general, it is the kinetics of the absorption (rather than the net absorption of amino acids) that determines the greater nutritional value of the protein hydrolysates. The use of a protein hydrolysate in post-exercise drinks is preferred because it results in a faster increase in plasma amino acid concentrations during a 2 h period than does intact protein,14 and in turn the concentrations of essential amino acids in the blood regulate muscle protein synthesis.35 A practical advantage is that one can ingest a protein hydrolysate-containing supplement immediately after exercise without becoming bloated and not excessively suppressing appetite, so one can eat another meal sooner, possibly optimising the post-exercise “anabolic window”. In addition, protein hydrolysate ingestion has a strong insulinotropic effect.14–18

Clearly, hydrolysed whey protein is the most popular protein hydrolysate among athletes. Whey protein has been singled out as the ultimate source of protein on the basis of an excellent amino acid profile.27,36 Whey may offer other benefits too.36,37,38,39,40 Casein hydrolysate is also used in some commercial protein mixtures. It should be realised that the biological value of hydrolysed collagen (also known as gelatin) is zero; thus, collagen supplementation as a protein source is not recommended. However, it has been suggested that hydrolysed collagen may be useful in counteracting degenerative joint diseases.40,41 Finally, some commercial products are enriched with wheat gluten hydrolysate—that is, “glutamine peptides”. Wheat gluten has a unique amino acid profile: glutamine residues account for about 40% of the amino acids.42 Glutamine is an important fuel for some cells of the immune system and may have specific immunostimulatory effects.43

It is worth noting that the “classical” model of protein metabolism, which views nitrogen intake in terms of the flux of free amino acids from dietary protein and their exchange between plasma and intracellular compartments and between free and protein-bound amino acids, is misleading because it ignores the flux of amino acids through intermediate pools of small peptides.34


A study by Calbet and MacLean44 was implemented to determine the effects of different protein-containing solutions on insulin response and amino acid availability in healthy humans. Four different 600 ml solutions were used. The glucose solution (control) contained only glucose (25 g/l), and the three additional solutions contained the same quantity of glucose plus protein (0.25 g/kg body mass) but proteins were derived from different sources: whey hydrolysate, pea hydrolysate, and a complete cow’s milk solution. This study indicated that:

  1. Ingestion of glucose and protein hydrolysate results in a synergistic and fast increase in plasma insulin. In fact, protein hydrolysates stimulated an increase in plasma insulin that was two and four times greater than that produced by the intact milk protein solution and glucose solution, respectively.

  2. Protein hydrolysates are absorbed at a faster rate from the small intestine than are intact milk proteins, as reflected by the rapid increase in the plasma concentration of branched-chain amino acids in peripheral blood.

  3. Whey protein hydrolysate elicited the greatest availability of amino acids during the 3 h postprandial period. The authors attributed this difference to the rapid increase in plasma amino acids evoked during the first 40 min of the digestive period, during which the increase was about 37% greater after the ingestion of whey protein hydrolysate solution than that after ingestion of the intact milk protein solution.

It is likely that the high concentrations of plasma amino acids and increased insulin explains the superiority of protein hydrolysates over intact proteins in promoting nitrogen utilisation. The co-ingestion of carbohydrate appears to affect the absorption kinetics, as one study showed that whey and casein proteins and their respective hydrolysates administered alone produce similar rates of intestinal absorption of amino acids.45 Alternatively, it is possible that this study used protein hydrolysates containing mainly oligopeptides.

More recently, Kaastra et al17 determined the extent to which the combined ingestion of high-glycaemic CHO and a casein protein hydrolysate with or without additional free leucine can increase insulin concentrations during post-exercise recovery. Fourteen male athletes were participated in three randomised crossover trials in which they performed 2 h of exercise. Thereafter, the subjects were studied for 3.5 h during which they ingested CHO only (0.8 g/kg/h), CHO + protein hydrolysate (0.8 and 0.4 g/kg/h, respectively), or CHO + protein hydrolysate + free leucine (0.8, 0.4, and 0.1 g/kg/h, respectively) in a double-blind fashion. The results revealed that plasma insulin responses were 108% and 190% greater in the CHO + protein hydrolysate and CHO + protein hydrolysate + leucine trial, respectively, compared with the CHO only trial. This study also indicated that addition of free phenylalanine, as applied in earlier studies,15,16 is not necessary to obtain such high post-exercise insulin responses.

Similarly, Manders et al18 examined plasma insulin responses after co-ingestion of casein protein hydrolysate with and without additional free leucine with a single bolus of high-glycaemic CHO. Again, the subjects participated in three trials in which blood insulin responses were determined after the ingestion of beverages of different composition: CHO only (0.7 g/kg), CHO + protein hydrolysate (0.7 and 0.3 g/kg, respectively) or CHO + protein hydrolysate + free leucine (0.7, 0.3 and 0.1 g/kg, respectively). The result indicated that plasma insulin responses were 66% and 221% greater in the healthy subjects in the CHO + protein hydrolysate and CHO + protein hydrolysate + free leucine trials, respectively, compared with those in the CHO only trial. In other words, this study also showed that co-ingestion of a protein hydrolysate with additional leucine strongly augments insulin secretion after the consumption of a single bolus of CHO.

This is in line with the data of Calbet and Holst,45 who reported that whey and casein hydrolysates elicited about 50% more gastric secretion than intact protein solutions, which was accompanied by higher plasma concentrations of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide during the first 20 min of the gastric emptying process. Besides well-known effects on pancreatic beta cells, this polypeptide also has direct metabolic effects on other tissues and organs, such as muscle, liver and adipose tissue, with most of its functions tending to increase anabolism.

The notion that the protein hydrolysates have strong insulinotropic properties is also supported by the studies examining the effects of intact protein-containing post-exercise drinks. Ivy et al46 compared the effects of CHO + intact protein (80 g CHO, 28 g protein, 6 g fat), low-CHO (80 g CHO, 6 g fat), or high-CHO (108 g CHO, 6 g fat) and reported that plasma insulin concentrations did not differ at any time among treatments. However, Zawadzki et al47 observed that plasma insulin concentrations for the CHO + intact protein treatment (112 and 40.7 g, respectively) were somewhat higher than those for the CHO treatment (112 g CHO).

A post-exercise drink containing a mixture of free amino acids also has a potent effect on insulin secretion.6 However, a large dose of amino acids can cause gastrointestinal discomfort. This may have something to do with the drink’s osmolarity. A protein hydrolysate containing dipeptides and tripeptides reduces osmolarity because equal solution weights of dipeptides and tripeptides have the same and one-third the osmolarity of free amino acids, respectively.34


A sophisticated study by Koopman et al16 investigated post-exercise muscle protein synthesis and whole body protein balance after the combined ingestion of high-glycaemic CHO with or without whey protein hydrolysate and/or leucine. Their nutritional protocol was rather rigorous; the subjects received a beverage volume of 3 ml/kg every 30 min to ensure a given dose of 0.3 g high-glycaemic CHO/kg and 0.2 g of a protein hydrolysate/kg every hour, with or without the addition of 0.1 g/kg/h free leucine. Repeated boluses were taken every 30 min until 330 min after exercise. The results revealed that the rates of whole body protein synthesis were highest in the CHO + protein hydrolysate + leucine trial: 95.6 (0.1)% v 92.0 (0.4)% and 94.2 (0.4)% in the CHO and CHO + protein hydrolysate trials, respectively. Similarly, the fractional synthetic rate in the vastus lateralis muscle was significantly higher in the CHO + protein hydrolysate + leucine trial than the CHO trial (0.095 (0.006)%/h v 0.061 (0.008)%/h, respectively), with intermediate values observed in the CHO + protein hydrolysate trial (0.0820 (0.0104)%/h).

Furthermore, the investigators found plasma insulin responses to correlate negatively with whole body protein degradation, whereas whole body protein synthesis correlated positively with plasma insulin response. However, the fractional synthetic rate did not correlate with the plasma insulin response, whereas the mixed muscle protein fractional synthetic rate did correlate with the amount of leucine that was ingested. It is difficult to interpret these results given the massive supplementation. Nevertheless, the authors concluded that, “the additional ingestion of free leucine in combination with protein and carbohydrate likely represents an effective strategy to increase muscle anabolism following resistance exercise.” Other recent studies have shown that relatively small doses of leucine can improve exercise performance48 and enhance the acquisition of strength.49

Although the Koopman study indicates that dietary supplementation-induced post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia plus hyperaminoacidaemia can have favourable effects on the acute phase response to resistance training, the effects of repeated supplementation on long-term adaptations to resistance training are currently unclear. To shed some light on this issue, Bird et al50 examined the effects of chronic high-glycaemic CHO and/or essential amino acid supplementation on hormonal and muscular adaptations in untrained young men. All subjects followed the same supervised, resistance training protocol twice a week for 12 weeks. After resistance exercise, the subjects consumed a high-glycaemic CHO supplement, an essential amino acid (6 g) supplement, a combined high-glycaemic CHO + essential amino acid supplement, or a placebo containing only aspartame and citrus flavouring. The results revealed that CHO + essential amino acid supplementation enhances muscular and hormonal adaptations to a greater extent than either CHO or essential amino acids consumed independently. Specifically, ingestion of CHO + essential amino acids produced the greatest relative increase in type I muscle fibre cross-sectional area. Changes in type II muscle fibres exhibited a similar trend.

Although beyond the scope of this paper, it is very likely that chronic reductions in the exercise-induced cortisol response associated with post-exercise ingestion of CHO and amino acids also positively affect the skeletal muscle hypertrophic adaptation to resistance training through reductions in hormone-mediated protein degradation. For reviews, see the recent papers by Volek,51 Kraemer and Ratamess,52 and Crewther et al.53


Contrary to popular belief, higher protein intake has no adverse effects on healthy kidneys,54,55 fluid status,56 or bone.57–60 In fact, proteins appear to have positive effects on bone health, as they increase circulating insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), which plays an important role in bone formation.58 For example, Ballard et al60 reported that a protein supplement during a strength and conditioning programme led to an increase in plasma concentrations of IGF-I in those subjects compared with the concentrations in a group who also trained but consumed an isocaloric CHO supplement. Also, serum bone alkaline phosphatase concentrations increased over time and tended to be higher in the protein group than in the CHO group, indicating increased bone formation.

In addition, IGF-I plays a critical role in development, growth, repair, and maintenance of skeletal muscle.61 Thus, it may partially explain why many strength/power athletes (especially bodybuilders) feel that a very high protein intake is beneficial for skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Indeed, studies indicate increased positive nitrogen balance when protein intake is increased62; however, more research is clearly needed before the mystery of protein requirements in those attempting to increase muscle mass is settled.62–65 Traditionally, the term “protein requirement” has meant the amount of dietary protein that must be consumed to provide the amino acids needed for the synthesis of those proteins irreversibly catabolised in the course of the body’s metabolism. It should be noted, however, that strength/power athletes are not concerned with the minimum amount of protein necessary to sustain normal body functions, but, rather, their absolute gains in muscle mass and strength. Other potential benefits of higher protein intake should be considered too.66–70

Interestingly, a recent placebo-controlled study by Flakoll et al71 reported that post-exercise protein/CHO supplementation (1) reduces bacterial/viral infections, (2) decreases the number of medical visits for muscle or joint problems, (3) diminishes episodes of heat exhaustion, (4) reduces muscle soreness, and (5) improves rifle scores in US marine recruits during basic training.


The chief lipid-related functions of insulin are inhibition of lipolysis and lipid oxidation (at 13 and 44 μU/ml, respectively).72 When insulin concentration falls below 13 μU/ml, lipolysis is powerfully and exponentially stimulated.72 Volek et al73 reported that a very-low-CHO diet significantly decreased serum insulin (−34%) and that about 70% of the variability in fat loss was accounted for by the decrease in serum insulin concentrations. Further, exogenous insulin promotes body fat accumulation,74 so one could speculate that insulinotropic supplements have similar effects. However, I feel this is hardly a concern for healthy athletes when these supplements are ingested immediately after rigorous exercise when the muscle cells are highly receptive to insulin75 and “screaming” for new fuel. The physiological state of a sedentary person and that of a well-trained athlete after exercise are poles apart. AMP-activated protein kinase acts as a “metabolic switch” in multiple tissues after exercise; the net effect of its activation is to increase fatty acid oxidation and diminish glycerolipid synthesis.76

To investigate the hormonal and metabolic adaptations occurring when high-glycaemic CHOs are ingested after exercise, Krzentowski et al77 compared the fate of a 100 g oral glucose load in healthy volunteers after an overnight fast at rest either without previous exercise or after 3 h of exercise performed on a treadmill at about 50% of the individual V̇o2max. Indirect calorimetry indicated that glucose ingestion in post-exercise recovery was associated with decreased CHO oxidation and increased lipid oxidation when compared with control conditions. More recently, Folch et al78 reported that de novo lipogenesis was totally suppressed after exercise, even when a very large CHO load was ingested, and that fat oxidation remained high in subjects who had exercised after both the small and large CHO meal. Finally, Bird et al50 observed that post-exercise ingestion of high-glycaemic CHO did not inhibit resistance training-induced fat loss.

Certainly, this author is not suggesting that insulinotropic supplements should be used while watching TV. It is possible that the hyperinsulinaemic condition prevalent in obese, insulin-resistant individuals is responsible for the repartitioning of fatty acids away from oxidation and toward storage.79


Recently, Dandona et al80 proposed that insulin is the ideal anti-inflammatory agent for critically ill patients, because it normalises plasma glucose concentrations (glucose is proinflammatory) while exerting its anti-inflammatory effect. In addition, insulin suppresses generation of reactive oxygen species and the expression of p47phox, a key component of NADPH oxidase, the enzyme that generates the superoxide radical.80 Thus, insulin has antioxidant effects too. As strenuous exercise produces muscle inflammation81 as well as increases generation of reactive oxygen species,82 it is possible that post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia offers additional benefits beyond muscle protein synthesis.


The studies reviewed here indicate that nutritional mixtures containing protein hydrolysates, added leucine, and high-glycaemic CHO greatly augment insulin secretion compared with high-glycaemic CHO only. When post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia is supported by protein hydrolysate and leucine ingestion-induced hyperaminoacidaemia, net protein deposition in muscle should occur. Thus, post-exercise recovery drinks containing these nutrients in conjunction with appropriate resistance training may lead to increased skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength. If so, such post-exercise supplements would be of considerable benefit not only to athletes but also to anyone who has lost muscle function through disease—for example, Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Future studies should evaluate their long-term effects on body composition and exercise performance.

What is already know on this topic

  • Both increased insulin and increased availability of amino acids are important for maximising muscle protein anabolism

What this study adds

  • This paper proposes that post-exercise hyperinsulinaemia supported by hyperaminoacidaemia induced by protein hydrolysate and leucine ingestion increases net protein deposition in muscle, leading to increased skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength, when combined with appropriate resistance training


View Abstract


  • Published Online First 1 September 2006

  • Competing interests: The author is a consultant to BioQuest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.