rss
Br J Sports Med 2006;40:208-213 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.019794
  • Original article

Validation of a skinfold based index for tracking proportional changes in lean mass

  1. G J Slater1,
  2. G M Duthie1,
  3. D B Pyne1,
  4. W G Hopkins2
  1. 1Australian Institute of Sport, Belconnen, ACT, Australia
  2. 2Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to:
 G M Duthie
 Australian Institute of Sport, Belconnen, ACT2616, Australia; gduthie{at}nswrugby.com.au
  • Accepted 27 September 2005

Abstract

Background: The lean mass index (LMI) is a new empirical measure that tracks within-subject proportional changes in body mass adjusted for changes in skinfold thickness.

Objective: To compare the ability of the LMI and other skinfold derived measures of lean mass to monitor changes in lean mass.

Methods: 20 elite rugby union players undertook full anthropometric profiles on two occasions 10 weeks apart to calculate the LMI and five skinfold based measures of lean mass. Hydrodensitometry, deuterium dilution, and dual energy x ray absorptiometry provided a criterion choice, four compartment (4C) measure of lean mass for validation purposes. Regression based measures of validity, derived for within-subject proportional changes through log transformation, included correlation coefficients and standard errors of the estimate.

Results: The correlation between change scores for the LMI and 4C lean mass was moderate (0.37, 90% confidence interval −0.01 to 0.66) and similar to the correlations for the other practical measures of lean mass (range 0.26 to 0.42). Standard errors of the estimate for the practical measures were in the range of 2.8–2.9%. The LMI correctly identified the direction of change in 4C lean mass for 14 of the 20 athletes, compared with 11 to 13 for the other practical measures of lean mass.

Conclusions: The LMI is probably as good as other skinfold based measures for tracking lean mass and is theoretically more appropriate. Given the impracticality of the 4C criterion measure for routine field use, the LMI may offer a convenient alternative for monitoring physique changes, provided its utility is established under various conditions.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.