Article Text

PDF
Low back pain investigations and prognosis: a review
  1. K M Refshauge,
  2. C G Maher
  1. School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Refshauge
 School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Sydney, NSW 1825, Australia; k.refshauge{at}fhs.usyd.edu.au

Abstract

Low back pain is reviewed in terms of when investigations are useful and its clinical course. Despite the extensive evaluation of the accuracy of investigations such as radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography, there is a surprising dearth of research to inform their use in primary care. There is no clear evidence on which to base judgments for selection of appropriate tests to confirm or exclude low back pain pathology. It appears that investigations are rarely necessary for low back pain. Specific investigations should be ordered to identify a particular pathology but should not be ordered routinely for general screening. In the absence of pathology, low back pain and its associated disability improve rapidly in the first weeks after onset, but, in contradiction to all guidelines, both commonly persist and the best evidence suggests that recurrences are common.

  • LBP, low pack pain
  • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
  • low back pain
  • investigations
  • prognosis
  • sciatica

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.