rss
Br J Sports Med 2007;41:174-179 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.031310
  • Original article

Validation of a field test to determine the maximal aerobic power in triathletes and endurance cyclists

  1. C González-Haro1,
  2. P A Galilea2,
  3. F Drobnic2,
  4. J F Escanero3
  1. 1Departmento de Farmacología y Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
  2. 2Centro de Alto Rendimiento de Sant Cugat del Vallés (CAR), Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3Departamento de Farmacología y Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
  1. Correspondence to:
 C González-Haro
 PhD, C/ Hortal, 53-55, 08032, Barcelona, Spain; ghcarlos{at}gmail.com
  • Accepted 4 December 2006
  • Published Online First 18 December 2006

Abstract

Objective: To validate a field test to assess the maximal and submaximal exercise aerobic adaptation under specific conditions, for endurance modality cyclists and triathletes.

Methods: 30 male and 4 female endurance modality cyclists and triathletes, with heterogeneous performance levels, performed three incremental tests: one in the laboratory and two in the field. Assessment of the validity of the field protocol was carried out by the Student’s t test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) of the maximal variables (maximal aerobic speed (MAS), maximal aerobic power (MAP), maximal heart rate (HRmax), maximal blood lactate concentration ([La−]max) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max)) and submaximal variables (heart rate, HR) measured in each one of the tests. The errors in measurement were calculated. The repeatability of the field tests was assessed by means of the test–retest of the two field tests, and the validity by means of the test–retest of the laboratory test with respect to the mean of the two field tests.

Results: No significant differences were found between the two field tests for any of the variables studied, but differences did exist for some variables between the laboratory tests with respect to the field tests (MAP, [La−]max, humidity (H), barometric pressure (Pb) and some characteristics of the protocols). The ICC of all the variables was high and the CV for the MAP was small. Furthermore, the measurement errors were small and therefore, assumable.

Conclusions: The incremental protocol of the proposed field test turned out to be valid to assess the maximal and submaximal aerobic adaptation.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 18 December 2006

  • Funding: This work was supported by a grant (DOGC no 3885 16.05.2006) from the Direcció General de l’Esport, Generalitat de Catalunya.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. bjsm.2006.031310v1
    2. 41/3/174 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.