rss
Br J Sports Med 2009;43:770-774 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.056416
  • Original article

Effect of task familiarisation on distribution of energy during a 2000 m cycling time trial

  1. J Corbett,
  2. M J Barwood,
  3. K Parkhouse
  1. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr J Corbett, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Spinnaker Building, Cambridge Road, Portsmouth PO1 2ER, UK; jo.corbett{at}port.ac.uk
  • Accepted 12 January 2009
  • Published Online First 27 January 2009

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effect of task familiarisation on the spontaneous pattern of energy expenditure during a series of 2000 m cycling time trials (TTs).

Method: Nine trained males completed three 2000 m TTs on a Velotron cycling ergometer. To examine pacing strategy, the data were assigned to 250 m “bins,” with the pattern of aerobic and anaerobic energy expenditure calculated from total work accomplished and gas-exchange data.

Results: There were no significant differences between trials in performance times (191.4 (SD 4.3), 189.4 (4.6), 190.1 (5.6) s), total aerobic (58.3 (2.7), 58.4 (3.1), 58.0 (3.4) kJ) and total anaerobic energy expenditure (16.4 (3.3), 17.3 (2.8), 16.5 (3.1) kJ). Pacing strategy in the second and third TT differed from the first TT in that a lower power output was adopted during the first 500 m, enabling a higher power output during the final 750 m of the TT. This adjustment in the pattern of energy expenditure was mediated by an alteration in the pattern of anaerobic energy expenditure, which paralleled changes in total energy expenditure. Furthermore, participants retained an anaerobic energy “reserve” enabling an end-spurt during the second and third trials.

Conclusion: Small modifications to the pacing strategy are made following a single bout of exercise, primarily by altering the rate of anaerobic energy expenditure. This may have served to prevent critical metabolic disturbances. The alteration in pacing strategy following the first exercise bout is compatible with a complex intelligent regulatory system.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the University of Portmouth Biosciences Ethical Comittee.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.